Left ventricular thrombus attenuation characterization in cardiac computed tomography angiography

被引:35
|
作者
Bittencourt, Marcio Sommer [1 ]
Achenbach, Stephan [2 ]
Marwan, Mohamed [2 ]
Seltmann, Martin [2 ]
Muschiol, Gerd [2 ]
Ropers, Dieter [2 ]
Daniel, Werner G. [2 ]
Pflederer, Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Univ Hosp, Div Internal Med, Sch Med, BR-05508000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Cardiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Cardiac computed tomography; Ventricular thrombi; Attenuation values; TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SYSTOLIC DYSFUNCTION; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; NATURAL-HISTORY; DIAGNOSIS; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcct.2011.12.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Because of their similar visual appearance, differentiation of left ventricular thrombotic material and myocardial wall can be difficult in contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. OBJECTIVE: We identified typical thrombi attenuation of left ventricular thrombi with the use of CT measurement. METHODS: Over a time period of 6 years; we retrospectively identified 31 patients who showed a left ventricular thrombus in CT angiography datasets. Patients underwent routine contrast cardiac CT to investigate coronary artery disease. CT attenuation of each thrombus was assessed in the 4-chamber view. CT densities were also determined in the ascending aorta, left ventricle, and myocardial wall both in the mid-septal and mid-lateral segments. The mean CT attenuation of thrombi and the difference between attenuation in thrombi, left ventricular cavity, and myocardial wall were determined. The ratio of attenuation values in thrombus versus aorta and myocardium versus aorta were also determined. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) CT attenuation of all left ventricular thrombi in 31 patients was 43.2 +/- 15.3 HU (range, 25-80 HU). Mean CT densities of septal and lateral myocardial wall were 102.9 +/- 23.1 HU (range, 63-155 HU) and 99.3 +/- 28.7 HU (range, 72-191 HU), respectively, and were thus significantly higher than the CT attenuation of thrombi (P < 0.001). A threshold of 65 HU yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 94%, 97%, 94%, and 97%, respectively, to differentiate thrombus from the myocardial wall. The mean ratio between CT attenuation of thrombus and CT attenuation within the ascending aorta was 0.11 +/- 0.05 (range, 0.04-0.23), which was significantly lower compared with the mean ratio between CT attenuation of the myocardial wall and the CT attenuation within the ascending aorta. CONCLUSION: CT attenuation within left ventricular thrombi was significantly lower than myocardial attenuation in CT angiography datasets. Assessment of CT attenuation may contribute to the differentiation of thrombi. (C) 2012 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 126
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Left ventricular thrombus development during ventricular fibrillation and resolution during resuscitation in a swine model of sudden cardiac arrest
    Budhram, Gavin R.
    Mader, Timothy J.
    Lutfy, Lucienne
    Murman, David
    Almulhim, Abdullah
    RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (05) : 689 - 693
  • [22] Comprehensive use of cardiac computed tomography to guide left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    Rajani, Ronak
    Pourmorteza, Amir
    Preston, Rebecca
    Razeghi, Orod
    Niederer, Steve
    Adhya, Shaumik
    Claridge, Simon
    Jackson, Tom
    Sieniewicz, Ben
    Gould, Justin
    Carr-White, Gerry
    Razavi, Reza
    McVeigh, Elliot
    Rinaldi, Christopher Aldo
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (09) : 1364 - 1372
  • [23] Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yu, Shandong
    Zhang, Heping
    Li, Hongwei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (23):
  • [24] Left ventricular and atrial strain imaging with cardiac computed tomography: Validation against echocardiography
    Szilveszter, Balint
    Nagy, Aniko I.
    Vattay, Borbala
    Apor, Astrid
    Kolossvary, Marton
    Bartykowszki, Andrea
    Simon, Judit
    Drobni, Zsofia D.
    Toth, Attila
    Suhai, Ferenc I.
    Merkely, Bela
    Maurovich-Horvat, Pal
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2020, 14 (04) : 363 - 369
  • [25] Computed tomography for detecting left atrial thrombus: a meta-analysis
    Wu, Xiaosan
    Wang, Congxia
    Zhang, Chunyan
    Zhang, Yan
    Ding, Faming
    Yan, Jiaojuan
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 8 (06) : 943 - 951
  • [26] Feasibility of fractal dimension analysis for left ventricular trabecular complexity using cardiac computed tomography
    Wu, Huanhua
    Zhou, Hairuo
    Cao, Xiaozheng
    Zhong, Wei
    Chen, Yuying
    Ma, Hui
    Peng, Yang
    Peng, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 418
  • [27] A Leaky False Pouch: Left Ventricle Pseudoaneurysm with Active Hemopericardium Detected on Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography
    Barforoshi, Shiva
    Shekar, Chandana
    Yu, Zoe
    Liu, Eugene
    Manubolu, Venkat
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    Roy, Sion K.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 18
  • [28] Left ventricular ejection fraction: real-world comparison between cardiac computed tomography and echocardiography in a large population
    Maffei, E.
    Messalli, G.
    Palumbo, A.
    Martini, C.
    Seitun, S.
    Aldrovandi, A.
    Cuttone, A.
    Emiliano, E.
    Malago, R.
    Weustink, A.
    Mollet, N.
    Cademartiri, F.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2010, 115 (07): : 1015 - 1027
  • [29] The role of cardiac computed tomography in diagnosing left ventricular noncompaction in patients with sinus node dysfunction
    Sustar, Aleksandra
    Zagar, Davorka
    Javoran, Dragan
    Persic, Viktor
    Stanic, Karlo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 214 : 77 - 78
  • [30] Left ventricular thrombus
    Peter J. Stokman
    Charn S. Nandra
    Richard W. Asinger
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2001, 3 (6) : 515 - 521