A Community of Practice of primary health care occupational therapists: Advancing practice-based knowledge

被引:9
作者
Marcolino, Tais Q. [1 ]
Kinsella, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Araujo, Angelica da S. [1 ]
Fantinatti, Eliane N. [3 ]
Takayama, Gabriela M. [4 ]
Vieira, Natalia M. U. [5 ]
Pereira, Ana J. A. T. [6 ]
Gomes, Laysla D. [1 ]
Galheigo, Sandra M. [3 ]
Ferigato, Sabrina H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, Brazil
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
[3] Psychosocial Care Ctr David Capistrano da Costa, Campinas, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Sensory Space Crescer Clin, Rio Claro, Brazil
[6] Fac Med Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
occupational therapy; peer group; primary health care; thinking; professional practice; MENTAL-HEALTH; SCHOLARSHIP; PRACTITIONERS; IDENTITY; DEBATE;
D O I
10.1111/1440-1630.12692
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction New contexts of practice demand that professionals engage in critical reflection to handle new situations and to create new knowledge that is responsive to professional practices situated in unique historical and social contexts. Community of Practice offers a framework for professions to reflect together on practice dilemmas and to generate practical solutions. Methods This paper presents a participatory action research project that traces the trajectory of a Community of Practice made up of seven occupational therapists working in primary health care and a researcher team, in Brazil. This study mapped the Community of Practice's trajectory between 2013 and 2017 through a group timeline analysis, which occurred gradually, in a collaborative mode. Results Three distinct phases in the trajectory of the development of the Community of Practice were identified: narrative perspectives were utilised as a means to identify dilemmas and difficulties in practice; the investigation of clients' needs and identification of issues was an ongoing process; and the generation of practice-based knowledge through the development of instruments to sustain clinical reasoning was a creative solution to practical dilemmas. Conclusion Three main aspects were highlighted: the partnership between researchers and practitioners as a potential avenue for the production of knowledge relevant to professional practice; the negotiation of the dilemma of "putting practice into words" in the context of constantly changing local and global perspectives; and the investigation of situated practice as an important element that can strengthen, strain, resist or even modify hegemonic perspectives of knowledge production in our field.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] An examination of the pairing between narrative and occupational science
    Bonsall, Aaron
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2012, 19 (01) : 92 - 103
  • [2] Carey H, 2019, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V27, P463, DOI [10.4322/2526-8910.ctoed2703, 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoED2703]
  • [3] Cabral LRD, 2017, CAD TER OCUP UFSCAR, V25, P179, DOI 10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAR0763
  • [4] de Toledo RF, 2014, INTERFACE-BOTUCATU, V18, P633
  • [5] Occupational therapists experiences of implementing a new complex intervention in collaboration with researchers: a qualitative longitudinal study
    Eriksson, Christina
    Erikson, Anette
    Tham, Kerstin
    Guidetti, Susanne
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 24 (02) : 116 - 125
  • [6] Foucault Michel., 1979, CRIT ANTHROPOL, V4, is, P131, DOI DOI 10.1177/0308275X7900401311
  • [7] Galheigo SM, 2020, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V28, P5, DOI [10.4322/2526-8910.ctoao2590, 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO2590]
  • [8] Galheigo SM, 2019, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V27, P776, DOI [10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1825, 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoao1825]
  • [9] Galheigo SM, 2018, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V26, P723, DOI [10.4322/2526-8910.ctoao1773, 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1773]
  • [10] Galheigo SM, 2017, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V25, P449, DOI 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1119