Feasibility study of waste (d) potential: co-digestion of organic wastes, synergistic effect and kinetics of biogas production

被引:42
作者
Paritosh, K. [1 ]
Mathur, S. [1 ]
Pareek, N. [2 ]
Vivekanand, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol Jaipur, Ctr Energy & Environm, Jaipur 302017, Rajasthan, India
[2] Cent Univ Rajasthan, Sch Life Sci, Dept Microbiol, Ajmer 305801, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Food waste; Bioenergy; Anaerobic digestion; Green waste; Nanoparticles; Kinetic study; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; SWINE MANURE; BATCH; MATTER; TEMPERATURE; SILAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-017-1453-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present study investigated the synergistic effect of co-digesting food and green waste from institute campus for enhanced biogas production in different ratios in batch tests (37 +/- 1 A degrees C, 90 rpm, 45 days). The results showed that blending improved the biogas production significantly, with highest biogas yield (660 +/- 24 mL g(-1) volatile solids) that was achieved at 75:25 of food and green waste ratio on volatile solids basis. The yield was 1.7- and 1.9-fold higher than the mono-digestion of food and green waste (370 +/- 34; 342 +/- 36 mL g(-1) volatile solids), respectively. The increase in biogas production may be attributed to optimum carbon to nitrogen ratio resulting in higher yield. The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles showed virtually no effect on biogas production. Characterization was carried out to gain an insight of feedstocks. Modified Gompertz and logistics models were applied for kinetic study of biogas production where modified Gompertz model showed goodness of fit (R (2) = 0.9978) with the experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1018
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry [J].
Abdelsalam, E. ;
Samer, M. ;
Attia, Y. A. ;
Abdel-Hadi, M. A. ;
Hassan, H. E. ;
Badr, Y. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 87 :592-598
[2]   Comparison of old and new municipal solid waste management systems in Denizli, Turkey [J].
Agdag, Osman Nuri .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (01) :456-464
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V17th
[4]   Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges [J].
Appels, Lise ;
Lauwers, Joost ;
Degreve, Jan ;
Helsen, Lieve ;
Lievens, Bart ;
Willems, Kris ;
Van Impe, Jan ;
Dewil, Raf .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) :4295-4301
[5]   Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste [J].
Browne, James D. ;
Murphy, Jerry D. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 104 :170-177
[6]   Effect of Total Solid Content to Biogas Production Rate from Vinasse [J].
Budiyono ;
Syaichurrozi, I. ;
Sumardiono, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2014, 27 (02) :177-184
[7]   Pyrolisis-MS and FT-IR analysis of fresh and decomposed dairy manure [J].
Calderón, FJ ;
McCarty, GW ;
Reeves, JB .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2006, 76 (1-2) :14-23
[8]   Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure [J].
Callaghan, FJ ;
Wase, DAJ ;
Thayanithy, K ;
Forster, CF .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (01) :71-77
[9]   Bacterial stress enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production in cattle manure sludge [J].
Cheong, Dae-Yeol ;
Hansen, Conly L. .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 72 (04) :635-643
[10]   Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure and food waste [J].
Deepanraj, B. ;
Sivasubramanian, V. ;
Jayaraj, S. .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 59 :72-76