The solar wind electric field does not control the dayside reconnection rate

被引:70
作者
Borovsky, Joseph E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Birn, Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] Space Sci Inst, Ctr Space Plasma Phys, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, AUSS, Lansing, MI USA
[3] Univ Lancaster, Dept Phys, Lancaster, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
reconnection; Axford conjecture; vorticity; electric fields; INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC-FIELD; MAGNETOPAUSE RECONNECTION; EARTHS MAGNETOSPHERE; MHD; SIMULATIONS; CHALLENGE; ENERGY; PENETRATION; BOUNDARY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1002/2013JA019193
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Working toward a physical understanding of how solar wind/magnetosphere coupling works, four arguments are presented indicating that the solar wind electric field (V) under bar (SW) X (B) under bar (SW) does not control the rate of reconnection between the solar wind and the magnetosphere. Those four arguments are (1) that the derived rate of dayside reconnection is not equal to solar wind electric field, (2) that electric field driver functions can be improved by a simple modification that disallows their interpretation as the solar wind electric field, (3) that the electric field in the magnetosheath is not equal to the electric field in the solar wind, and (4) that the magnetosphere can mass load and reduce the dayside reconnection rate without regard for the solar wind electric field. The data are more consistent with a coupling function based on local control of the reconnection rate than the Axford conjecture that reconnection is controlled by boundary conditions irrespective of local parameters. Physical arguments that the solar wind electric field controls dayside reconnection are absent; it is speculated that it is a coincidence that the electric field does so well at correlations with geomagnetic indices.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 760
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
AXFORD I, 1984, MAGNETIC RECONNECTIO, P360
[2]   HF-radar observations of the dayside magnetic merging rate: A Geospace Environment Modeling boundary layer campaign study [J].
Baker, KB ;
Rodger, AS ;
Lu, G .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1997, 102 (A5) :9603-9617
[3]   SOLAR-WIND MAGNETOSPHERE COUPLING - PROCESSES AND OBSERVATIONS [J].
BAUMJOHANN, W ;
PASCHMANN, G .
PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1987, T18 :61-72
[4]  
Bevington P. R., 2002, Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences
[5]   The role of compressibility in energy release by magnetic reconnection [J].
Birn, J. ;
Borovsky, J. E. ;
Hesse, M. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2012, 19 (08)
[6]   Scaling of asymmetric reconnection in compressible plasmas [J].
Birn, J. ;
Borovsky, J. E. ;
Hesse, M. ;
Schindler, K. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2010, 17 (05)
[7]   ENERGY RELEASE AND TRANSFER IN SOLAR FLARES: SIMULATIONS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONNECTION [J].
Birn, J. ;
Fletcher, L. ;
Hesse, M. ;
Neukirch, T. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 695 (02) :1151-1162
[8]   Properties of asymmetric magnetic reconnection [J].
Birn, J. ;
Borovsky, J. E. ;
Hesse, M. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2008, 15 (03)
[9]  
Birn J, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-SPACE, V106, P3715, DOI 10.1029/1999JA900449
[10]   Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge: Resistive tearing, anisotropic pressure and Hall effects [J].
Birn, J ;
Hesse, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2001, 106 (A3) :3737-3750