Revealing transport inequality from an activity space perspective: A study based on human mobility data

被引:13
作者
Gao, Qi-Li [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yue, Yang [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Zhong, Chen [3 ]
Cao, Jinzhou [4 ]
Tu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qing-Quan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Shenzhen Key Lab Spatial Smart Sensing & Serv, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Dept Urban Informat, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Coll London UCL, Bartlett Ctr Adv Spatial Anal CASA, London WC1E 6BT, England
[4] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Urban Land Resources Monitoring & Simulat, Shenzhen 518034, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Univ, Room 1402,Sci Bldg,3688 Nanhai Ave, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Transport inequality; Social exclusion; Activity space; Human mobility; Private car; Public transit; ACTIVITY-TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL EXCLUSION; ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES; PRIVATE CAR; DISADVANTAGE; ACCESSIBILITY; SEGREGATION; PATTERNS; TRANSIT; PHONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2022.104036
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Closing mobility and accessibility gaps between public transit riders and private car users is key to tackling social exclusion and achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, place-based potential accessibility methods do not accurately measure real gaps in the uptake of activity opportunities because people usually have limited activity spaces. This study introduces people-based activity space approaches to measure activity dis-parities between the two modal groups. To overcome difficulties in obtaining large-scale individual activity data, this study used vehicle plate recognition data and public transit smart card data to anonymously identify ac-tivities. Individual activity spaces were characterised by six primary activity features from different dimensions. The analysis confirmed that, relative to transit riders, people who use cars on average accessed more activities within a larger activity space and enjoyed overall higher travel efficiency. A comprehensive indicator was further derived from the primary activity features to quantify activity disparities at the zone level. Zones with the highest risk of social exclusion were observed in the outskirts. In contrast, the city centre and inner suburbs exhibited significant equality of the two transport modes in fulfilling mobility needs for engagement in activities. Activity disparities between the two modalities were determined per area in specific activity dimensions, namely activity extensity, activity diversity, and travel efficiency. Finally, statistical models provided evidence that public transport facilities (especially rail transit) and location factors (distance to the city centre) are essential in determining modality-associated gaps in access to urban activity opportunities. Socioeconomic status and land use diversity also partially contributed to the inequality in specific dimensions of the activity space. This people -centred approach is critical for tackling transport inequality and achieving SDGs while "leaving no one behind".
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Agulnik P., 2002, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL
  • [2] Investigating commute satisfaction differences of private car users and public transport users in a developing country context
    Al-Ayyash, Zahwa
    Abou-Zeid, Maya
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2019, 46 (03) : 515 - 536
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, MAKING CONNECTIONS F, DOI DOI 10.1680/MUEN.2003.156.2.81
  • [4] GeoDa:: An introduction to spatial data analysis
    Anselin, L
    Syabri, I
    Kho, Y
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 38 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [5] Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv metropolitan area
    Benenson, Itzhak
    Martens, Karel
    Rofe, Yodan
    Kwartler, Ariela
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 47 (03) : 499 - 515
  • [6] Measuring the Gap Between Car and Transit Accessibility Estimating Access Using a High-Resolution Transit Network Geographic Information System
    Benenson, Itzhak
    Martens, Karel
    Rofe, Yodan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2144) : 28 - 35
  • [7] Bradshaw J., 2004, DRIVERS SOCIAL EXCLU
  • [8] Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: initial results from the Toronto Travel-Activity Panel Survey (TTAPS)
    Buliung, Ron N.
    Roorda, Matthew J.
    Remmel, Tarmo K.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2008, 35 (06) : 697 - 722
  • [9] Social exclusion in Britain 1991-1995
    Burchardt, T
    Le Grand, J
    Piachaud, D
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 33 (03) : 227 - 244
  • [10] Burchardt T., 2002, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL