Charged particle therapy-optimization, challenges and future directions

被引:343
作者
Loeffler, Jay S. [1 ,2 ]
Durante, Marco [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] GSI Helmholtzzentrum Schwerionenforsch, Dept Biophys, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Darmstadt, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
CARBON-ION RADIOTHERAPY; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; PROTON-BEAM THERAPY; CANCER STEM-CELLS; CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; RECURRENT RECTAL-CANCER; RISK PROSTATE-CANCER; EFFECT MODEL LEM; PHASE-II;
D O I
10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.79
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The use of charged particle therapy to control tumours non-invasively offers advantages over conventional radiotherapy. Protons and heavy ions deposit energy far more selectively than X-rays, allowing a higher local control of the tumour, a lower probability of damage to healthy tissue, low risk of complications and the chance for a rapid recovery after therapy. Charged particles are also useful for treating tumours located in areas that surround tissues that are radiosensitive and in anatomical sites where surgical access is limited. Current trial outcomes indicate that accelerated ions can potentially replace surgery for radical cancer treatments, which might be beneficial as the success of surgical cancer treatments are largely dependent on the expertise and experience of the surgeon and the location of the tumour. However, to date, only a small number of controlled randomized clinical trials have made comparisons between particle therapy and X-rays. Therefore, although the potential advantages are clear and supported by data, the cost: benefit ratio remains controversial. Research in medical physics and radiobiology is focusing on reducing the costs and increasing the benefits of this treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 424
页数:14
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]   An evidence based review of proton beam therapy: The report of ASTRO's emerging technology committee [J].
Allen, Aaron M. ;
Pawlicki, Todd ;
Dong, Lei ;
Fourkal, Eugene ;
Buyyounouski, Mark ;
Cengel, Keith ;
Plastaras, John ;
Bucci, Mary K. ;
Yock, Torunn I. ;
Bonilla, Luisa ;
Price, Robert ;
Harris, Eleanor E. ;
Konski, Andre A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 103 (01) :8-11
[2]   Modern Hypofractionation Schedules for Tangential Whole Breast Irradiation Decrease the Fraction Size-corrected Dose to the Heart [J].
Appelt, A. L. ;
Vogelius, I. R. ;
Bentzen, S. M. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (03) :147-152
[3]   Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response [J].
Bao, Shideng ;
Wu, Qiulian ;
McLendon, Roger E. ;
Hao, Yueling ;
Shi, Qing ;
Hjelmeland, Anita B. ;
Dewhirst, Mark W. ;
Bigner, Darell D. ;
Rich, Jeremy N. .
NATURE, 2006, 444 (7120) :756-760
[4]   Dose-volume prediction of radiation-related complications after proton beam radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations [J].
Barker, FG ;
Butler, WE ;
Lyons, S ;
Cascio, E ;
Ogilvy, CS ;
Loeffler, JS ;
Chapman, PH .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 99 (02) :254-263
[5]   Locoregional treatment for adult soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck: An institutional review [J].
Barker, JL ;
Paulino, AC ;
Feeney, S ;
McCulloch, T ;
Hoffman, H .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2003, 9 (01) :49-57
[6]  
Bartal T, 2012, NAT PHYS, V8, P139, DOI [10.1038/nphys2153, 10.1038/NPHYS2153]
[7]   Exploring the role of cancer stem cells in radioresistance [J].
Baumann, Michael ;
Krause, Mechthild ;
Hill, Richard .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2008, 8 (07) :545-554
[8]   Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy [J].
Bert, C. ;
Durante, M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (16) :R113-R114
[9]   Particle therapy for noncancer diseases [J].
Bert, Christoph ;
Engenhart-Cabillic, Rita ;
Durante, Marco .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (04) :1716-1727
[10]  
Blechacz Boris, 2013, Recent Results Cancer Res, V190, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16037-0_1