Calculation of the interface curvature and normal vector with the level-set method

被引:8
作者
Lervag, Karl Yngve [1 ]
Mueller, Bernhard [1 ]
Munkejord, Svend Tollak [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] SINTEF Energy Res, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Level-set method; Curvature discretization; Normal-vector discretization; Curve-fitting discretization scheme; Finite differences; Ghost-fluid method; DISCRETIZATION; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.06.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This article addresses the use of the level-set method for capturing the interface between two fluids. One of the advantages of the level-set method is that the curvature and the normal vector of the interface can be readily calculated from the level-set function. However, in cases where the level-set method is used to capture topological changes, the standard discretization techniques for the curvature and the normal vector do not work properly. This is because they are affected by the discontinuities of the signed-distance function half-way between two interfaces. This article addresses the calculation of normal vectors and curvatures with the level-set method for such cases. It presents a discretization scheme based on the geometry-aware curvature discretization by Macklin and Lowengrub [1]. As the present scheme is independent of the ghost-fluid method, it becomes more generally applicable, and it can be implemented into an existing level-set code more easily than Macklin and Lowengrub's scheme [1]. The present scheme is compared with the second-order central-difference scheme and with Macklin and Lowengrub's scheme [1], first for a case with no flow, then for a case where two drops collide in a 20 shear flow, and finally for a case where two drops collide in an axisymmetric flow. In the latter two cases, the Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible two-phase flow are solved. The article also gives a comparison of the calculation of normal vectors with the direction difference scheme presented by Macklin and Lowengrub in [2] and with the present discretization scheme. The results show that the present discretization scheme yields more robust calculations of the curvature than the second-order central difference scheme in areas where topological changes are imminent. The present scheme compares well to Macklin and Lowengrub's method [1]. The results also demonstrate that the direction difference scheme [2] is not always sufficient to accurately calculate the normal vectors. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 230
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A FAST LEVEL SET METHOD FOR PROPAGATING INTERFACES [J].
ADALSTEINSSON, D ;
SETHIAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1995, 118 (02) :269-277
[2]  
[Anonymous], 5 EUR C COMP FLUID D
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS NORWEGIAN U S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 6 NAT C COMP MECH ME
[5]   A CONTINUUM METHOD FOR MODELING SURFACE-TENSION [J].
BRACKBILL, JU ;
KOTHE, DB ;
ZEMACH, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1992, 100 (02) :335-354
[6]   An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization [J].
Desjardins, Olivier ;
Moureau, Vincent ;
Pitsch, Heinz .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2008, 227 (18) :8395-8416
[7]   MONOTONE PIECEWISE CUBIC INTERPOLATION [J].
FRITSCH, FN ;
CARLSON, RE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1980, 17 (02) :238-246
[8]   Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods [J].
Gottlieb, S ;
Shu, CW ;
Tadmor, E .
SIAM REVIEW, 2001, 43 (01) :89-112
[9]   A balanced force refined level set grid method for two-phase flows on unstructured flow solver grids [J].
Herrmann, M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2008, 227 (04) :2674-2706
[10]  
Lang S., 2002, ALGEBRA