Patch testing - a valuable tool for investigating non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions to antibiotics

被引:57
|
作者
Pinho, A. [1 ,2 ]
Coutinho, I. [1 ,2 ]
Gameiro, A. [1 ,2 ]
Gouveia, M. [1 ,2 ]
Goncalo, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Coimbra, Dept Dermatol, Ctr Hosp Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Dermatol Clin, Fac Med, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS; STEVENS-JOHNSON SYNDROME; SKIN-TESTS; CROSS-REACTIVITY; ALLERGY; HYPERSENSITIVITY; PENICILLINS; ERUPTIONS; EOSINOPHILIA; AMOXICILLIN;
D O I
10.1111/jdv.13796
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Antibiotics are among the most frequent causes of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR); patch testing may be an important tool in their evaluation and management. We assessed the role of patch testing as a diagnostic tool in non-immediate CADR to antibiotics, and evaluated cross-reactivity among them. Methods We reviewed data from all patients with non-immediate CADR attributed to antibiotics, which were patch tested between 2000 and 2014 at our dermatology department. Results Patch tests were performed in 260 patients, and showed overall reactivity to antibiotics of 21.5%, especially in the context of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (31.6%), maculopapular exanthema (MPE) (21.8%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (20%) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) (18.1%). Patch test reactivity was higher for amoxicillin, mainly in DRESS (44.4%) and MPE (25.6%), and dicloxacillin (50% in AGEP and 37.5% in MPE). Reactivity to clindamycin occurred, especially in the setting of MPE (23.2%). In AGEP and DRESS, patch tests were useful in detecting reactivity to quinolones (50-100%). Overall reactivity was lower for vancomycin (9.1%), co-trimoxazole (8.6%), macrolides (4.8%) and cephalosporins (4.4%). Positive patch tests for more than one antibiotic occurred in 29/56 cases (51.8%), mostly explained by cross-reactions. Twenty of 24 cases reacted to both amoxicillin and ampicillin. All five cases reacting to ciprofloxacin cross-reacted with other quinolones. Conclusion Although oral rechallenge is considered the gold standard for confirming drug imputability in CADR, patch testing could be suggested as a first choice in the study of non-immediate reactions, since it is a safe and valuable procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 287
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Systemic drugs inducing non-immediate cutaneous adverse reactions and contact sensitizers evoke similar responses in THP-1 cells
    Goncalo, Margarida
    Martins, Joao
    Silva, Ana
    Neves, Bruno
    Figueiredo, Americo
    Cruz, Teresa
    Lopes, Celeste
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 35 (04) : 398 - 406
  • [32] Polysensitivity in delayed cutaneous adverse drug reactions to macrolides, clindamycin and pristinamycin: clinical history and patch testing
    El Khoury, M.
    Assier, H.
    Gener, G.
    Paul, M.
    Haddad, C.
    Chosidow, O.
    Wolkenstein, P.
    Ingen-Housz-Oro, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 179 (04) : 978 - 979
  • [33] A multicentre study to determine the value and safety of drug patch tests for the three main classes of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions
    Barbaud, A.
    Collet, E.
    Milpied, B.
    Assier, H.
    Staumont, D.
    Avenel-Audran, M.
    Grange, A.
    Amarger, S.
    Girardin, P.
    Guinnepain, M. -T.
    Truchetet, F.
    Lasek, A.
    Waton, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (03) : 555 - 562
  • [34] Nested case-control study investigating the diagnostic role of tissue eosinophilia in adverse cutaneous drug reactions
    Samuelov, L.
    Nathan, A.
    Slutsky, E.
    Fruchter, D.
    Gat, A.
    Sprecher, E.
    Goldberg, I.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2019, 33 (06) : 1152 - 1157
  • [35] Patch tests in nonimmediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions: The importance of late readings on day 4
    Bhujoo, Zoe
    Ingen-Housz-Oro, Saskia
    Gener, Gwendeline
    Gaudin, Olivier
    Fleck, Margaux
    Verlinde-Carvalho, Muriel
    Paul, Muriel
    Chosidow, Olivier
    Wolkenstein, Paul
    Assier, Haudrey
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2022, 86 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [36] Cutaneous adverse drug reaction induced by oral dexamethasone with possible cross-reactivity to Group 1 corticosteroids confirmed by patch testing and intradermal testing
    Watts, Timothy J.
    Thursfield, David
    Haque, Rubaiyat
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2019, 81 (05) : 384 - +
  • [37] Safety and cost effectiveness of supervised ambulatory drug provocation tests in children with mild non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams
    Jaoui, Ariane
    Delalande, Delphine
    Siouti, Souha
    Benoist, Gregoire
    Seve, Edouard
    Ponvert, Claude
    Scheinmann, Pierre
    Faour, Hassan
    Neuraz, Antoine
    Garcelon, Nicolas
    Delacourt, Christophe
    Lezmi, Guillaume
    ALLERGY, 2019, 74 (12) : 2482 - 2485
  • [38] Cutaneous adverse drug reactions during chemotherapy: consider non-antineoplastic drugs
    Bursztejn, A. C.
    Trechot, Ph.
    Cuny, J. F.
    Schmutz, J. L.
    Barbaud, A.
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2008, 58 (06) : 365 - U3
  • [39] Serum IFN-γ-inducible chemolcines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are elevated in non-immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions
    Wang, Fang
    Cai, Renxin
    He, Dingyang
    Zhao, Yukun
    Ye, Yanting
    Zhang, Xingqi
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (03) : 236 - 241
  • [40] Integrating in vivo and ex vivo approaches for culprit drug identification in cutaneous adverse drug reactions from non-beta lactam antibiotics
    Ratanasutiranont, Narumol
    Mongkolpathumrat, Pungjai
    Rujirawan, Patcharapong
    Rerknimitr, Pawinee
    Klaewsongkram, Jettanong
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 33 (04)