Selection of SNP from 50K and 777K arrays to predict breed of origin in cattle

被引:45
作者
Hulsegge, B. [1 ]
Calus, M. P. L. [1 ]
Windig, J. J. [1 ]
Hoving-Bolink, A. H. [1 ]
Maurice-van Eijndhoven, M. H. T. [1 ]
Hiemstra, S. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Ctr Genet Resources, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
关键词
assignment test; cattle breeds; high density SNP chips; SNP selection methods; SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; INFORMATIVE MARKERS; ASSIGNMENT; INFERENCE; ANCESTRY; HOLSTEIN; JERSEY; PHASE;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2013-6678
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Reliable breed assignment can be performed with SNP. Currently, high density SNP chips are available with large numbers of SNP from which the most informative SNP can be selected for breed assignment. Several methods have been published to select the most informative SNP to distinguish among breeds. In this study, we evaluated Delta, Wright's F-ST, and Weir and Cockerham's F-ST, and extended these methods by adding a rule to avoid selection of sets of SNP in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) providing the same information. The SNP that had a r(2) value >0.3 with any of the SNP already selected were discarded. The different selection methods were evaluated for both the 50K SNP and 777K Bovine BeadChip. Animals from 4 cattle breeds (989 Holstein Friesian, 97 Groningen White headed, 137 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel, and 64 Dutch Friesian) were genotyped. After editing 30,447 and 452,525 SNP were available for the 50K and 777K SNP chip, respectively. All selection methods showed that only a small set of SNP is needed to differentiate among the 4 Dutch cattle breeds, whereas comparison of the selection methods showed only small differences. In general, the 777K performed marginally better than the 50K BeadChip, especially at higher confidence thresholds. The rule to avoid selection of SNP in high LD reduced the required number of SNP to achieve correct breed assignment. The Global Weir and Cockerham's F-ST performed marginally better than other selection methods. There was little overlap in the SNP selected from the 2 BeadChips, whereas the number of SNP selected was about the same.
引用
收藏
页码:5128 / 5134
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Ascertainment Biases in SNP Chips Affect Measures of Population Divergence [J].
Albrechtsen, Anders ;
Nielsen, Finn Cilius ;
Nielsen, Rasmus .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2010, 27 (11) :2534-2547
[2]  
[Anonymous], ILL GENCALL DAT AN S
[3]   Evaluation of factors affecting individual assignment precision using microsatellite data from horse breeds and simulated breed crosses [J].
Bjornstad, G ;
Roed, KH .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 2002, 33 (04) :264-270
[4]   A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype-Phase Inference for Large Data Sets of Trios and Unrelated Individuals [J].
Browning, Brian L. ;
Browning, Sharon R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2009, 84 (02) :210-223
[5]  
Chan E., 2012, CALC WCFSTATS
[6]   Breed assignment test in four Italian beef cattle breeds [J].
Dalvit, C. ;
De Marchi, M. ;
Dal Zotto, R. ;
Gervaso, M. ;
Meuwissen, T. ;
Cassandro, M. .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2008, 80 (02) :389-395
[7]   Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle [J].
de Roos, A. P. W. ;
Hayes, B. J. ;
Spelman, R. J. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
GENETICS, 2008, 179 (03) :1503-1512
[8]   Use of the canonical discriminant analysis to select SNP markers for bovine breed assignment and traceability purposes [J].
Dimauro, C. ;
Cellesi, M. ;
Steri, R. ;
Gaspa, G. ;
Sorbolini, S. ;
Stella, A. ;
Macciotta, N. P. P. .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 2013, 44 (04) :377-382
[9]   Comparison of measures of marker informativeness for ancestry and admixture mapping [J].
Ding, Lili ;
Wiener, Howard ;
Abebe, Tilahun ;
Altaye, Mekbib ;
Go, Rodney C. P. ;
Kercsmar, Carolyn ;
Grabowski, Greg ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Hershey, Gurjit K. Khurana ;
Chakorborty, Ranajit ;
Baye, Tesfaye M. .
BMC GENOMICS, 2011, 12
[10]  
HILL W G, 1968, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, V38, P226, DOI 10.1007/BF01245622