Compromise ranking approach for sustainable concept selection in an Indian modular switches manufacturing organization

被引:10
作者
Vinodh, S. [1 ]
Kamala, V. [1 ]
Shama, M. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Sustainability; Concept selection; Multi criteria decision making; Life cycle assessment; Fuzzy logic; VIKOR; VIKOR METHOD; FUZZY VIKOR;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-012-4134-z
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The modern manufacturing organizations are forced to adopt the principles of sustainability to sustain in the competitive market scenario. Sustainability paradigm stipulates that manufacturing organizations develop eco-friendly products coupled with economic and social dimensions. Sustainability concepts include life cycle impact assessment, environmental conscious quality function deployment, environmental impact assessment, life cycle assessment, and theory of inventive problem solving. The concept selection in the context of sustainability is the typical multicriteria decision-making problem (MCDM). MCDM method can be used to find out the best alternative among the given alternatives. In our study, we have utilized the compromise ranking method namely VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje. This method focuses on ranking and selecting from a set of conflicting criteria based on the measure of closeness to the ideal solution. The best concept has been selected for implementation in the organization as stated by Opricovic and Tzeng (Eur J Oper Res 156:445-455, 2004).
引用
收藏
页码:1709 / 1714
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Aliakbar M, 2011, P INT MULT ENG COMP, VII
[2]  
Christoph H, 2008, P SUST MAN 6 2008 GL
[3]   Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection [J].
Devi, Kavita .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) :14163-14168
[4]  
Hambali A, 2009, SCI RES ESSAYS, V4, P198
[5]   A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection [J].
Jahan, Ali ;
Mustapha, Faizal ;
Ismail, Md Yusof ;
Sapuan, S. M. ;
Bahraminasab, Marjan .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2011, 32 (03) :1215-1221
[6]   How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability [J].
Krajnc, D ;
Glavic, P .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 55 (04) :551-563
[7]   Assessing the sustainability performances of industries [J].
Labuschagne, C ;
Brent, AC ;
van Erck, RPG .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (04) :373-385
[8]  
LeVan SL, 2007, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, DOI [10.1065/lca2006.11.286, DOI 10.1065/LCA2006.11.286]
[9]   Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review [J].
Mebratu, Desta .
1998, Elsevier Inc. (18)
[10]  
Nezami FG, 2011, IEEE I SYMP SUST SYS