Surgical margin status of specimen and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 400 procedures

被引:13
作者
Porpiglia, Francesco [1 ]
Fiori, Cristian [1 ]
Manfredi, Matteo [1 ]
Grande, Susanna [1 ]
Poggio, Massimiliano [1 ]
Bollito, Enrico [2 ]
Papotti, Mauro [2 ]
Scarpa, Roberto Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, San Luigi Hosp, Dept Clin & Biol Sci, Div Urol, I-10043 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, San Luigi Hosp, Dept Clin & Biol Sci, Div Pathol, I-10043 Turin, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Laparoscopy; Surgical margins; Recurrence; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CANCER; PROGRESSION; IMPACT; LENGTH; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-011-0711-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To analyse the surgical margins status of prostatic glands, resected by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for prostate cancer, and to correlate it with biochemical free survival rate (BFSR). Data were collected prospectively from 405 patients undergoing LRP from 2000 to 2009 at a single institution. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy were excluded from the study. Three hundred patients matched all the criteria: 232 of these had negative surgical margins (NSM) and 68 positive surgical margins (PSM). The median follow-up was 62 months. PSM were classified based on the following: (a) the number of margins, monofocal and multifocal, (b) the location, apical or non-apical and (c) the extension, a parts per thousand currency sign2.8 mm or > 2.8 mm. These data were then entered into a multivariate analysis. Overall BFSR rate was 67.6% in PSM group and 88.8% in NSM group (P < 0.001). We registered a HR of 3.78 in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). In terms of the extension, BFSR in univariate survival analysis was 77.8% in a parts per thousand currency sign2.8 mm PSM and 38.9% in > 2.8 mm PSM (P = 0.003), with a HR of 5.68 (P = 0.011) in multivariate analysis. BFSR was 59% for apical margins and 77% for non-apical margins (P = 0.038). In monofocal margins, BFSR was 73%, while 53% in multifocal (P = 0.014). We recommend careful evaluation of patients with PSM following LRP, especially if they are more than 2.8 mm, and in these cases, adjuvant therapy should be considered after radical surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Babaian RJ, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1414
  • [2] Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy
    Blute, ML
    Bostwick, DG
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Slezak, JM
    Martin, SK
    Amling, CL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [3] Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: The American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Aus, Gunnar
    Burnett, Arthur L.
    Canby-Hagino, Edith D.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Dmochowski, Roger R.
    Eton, David T.
    Forman, Jeffrey D.
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Hernandez, Javier
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Kraus, Stephen R.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Tangen, Catherine
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    Thompson, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (02) : 540 - 545
  • [4] Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Fesseha, T
    Sakr, W
    Grignon, D
    Banerjee, M
    Wood, DP
    Pontes, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (06) : 2176 - 2179
  • [5] Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: Data from the CaPSURE database
    Grossfeld, GD
    Chang, JJ
    Broering, JM
    Miller, DP
    Yu, J
    Flanders, SC
    Henning, JM
    Stier, DM
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) : 1171 - 1177
  • [6] Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer:: Multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients
    Karakiewicz, PI
    Eastham, JA
    Graefen, M
    Cagiannos, I
    Stricker, PD
    Klein, E
    Cangiano, T
    Schröder, FH
    Scardino, PT
    Kattan, MW
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (06) : 1245 - 1250
  • [7] Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy
    Kausik, SJ
    Blute, ML
    Sebo, TJ
    Leibovich, BC
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Slezak, J
    Zincke, H
    [J]. CANCER, 2002, 95 (06) : 1215 - 1219
  • [8] Impact of Positive Apical Surgical Margins on Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Kordan, Yakup
    Salem, Shady
    Chang, Sam S.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Baumgartner, Roxelyn
    Phillips, Sharon
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2695 - 2701
  • [9] Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance
    Montironi, R
    Mazzucchelli, R
    Kwast, T
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2003, 442 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [10] Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin
    Ochiai, Atsushi
    Sotelo, Tiffany
    Troncoso, Patricia
    Bhadkamkar, Viju
    Babaian, R. Joseph
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (02) : 308 - 312