Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke

被引:365
作者
Beninato, M
Gill-Body, KM
Salles, S
Stark, PC
Black-Schaffer, RM
Stein, J
机构
[1] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Grad Programs Phys Therapy, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Biostat Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 01期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; sensitivity and specificity; stroke;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FIM instrument in patients poststroke. Design: Prospective case series discharged over a 9-month period. Setting: Long-term acute care hospital. Participants: Patients with stroke (N = 113). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Admission, discharge, and change scores were calculated for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Assessments of clinical change were rated at discharge on a 15-point (-7 to +7) Likert scale by attending physicians, with MCID defined at a cutoff score of 3. The FIM change scores associated with MCID were identified from receiver operating characteristic curves. Bayesian analysis was used to determine the probability of individual patients achieving MCID. Results: FIM change scores associated with MCID were 22, 17, and 3 for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM, respectively. The accuracy of the MCID was greater when subjects were categorized based on admission FIM scores than when considering the sample as a whole. Larger FIM change scores were related to MCID in subjects with lower admission FIM scores. Conclusions: These findings will assist in the interpretation of FIM change scores relative to physicians' assessments of important clinical change.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in patients with Parkinson's disease [J].
Godi, Marco ;
Arcolin, Ilaria ;
Giardini, Marica ;
Corna, Stefano ;
Schieppati, Marco .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2020, 80 :14-19
[42]   The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory [J].
Malec, James F. ;
Kean, Jacob ;
Monahan, Patrick O. .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2017, 32 (04) :E47-E54
[43]   A Standard Method for Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Rehabilitation Measures [J].
Malec, James F. ;
Ketchum, Jessica M. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 101 (06) :1090-1094
[44]   Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Functional Gait Assessment in Older Adults [J].
Beninato, Marianne ;
Fernandes, Arlene ;
Plummer, Laura S. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 94 (11) :1594-1603
[45]   Social determinants of discharge destination for patients after stroke with low admission FIM instrument scores [J].
Nguyen, Tuan-Anh ;
Page, Andrew ;
Aggarwal, Arun ;
Henke, Peter .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 88 (06) :740-744
[46]   Is training speed an accurate predictor of who attains a minimal clinically important difference in the six-minute walk test in people with chronic stroke? [J].
McCartney, Kiersten M. ;
Boyne, Pierce ;
Pohlig, Ryan T. ;
Morton, Susanne M. ;
Reisman, Darcy S. .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2025,
[47]   Examining the Function In Sitting Test for Validity, Responsiveness, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Inpatient Rehabilitation [J].
Gorman, Sharon L. ;
Harro, Cathy C. ;
Platko, Christina ;
Greenwald, Cara .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (12) :2304-2311
[48]   Minimal clinically important difference for change in comfortable gait speed of adults with pathology: a systematic review [J].
Bohannon, Richard W. ;
Glenney, Susan S. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (04) :295-300
[49]   Meaningful Gait Speed Improvement During the First 60 Days Poststroke: Minimal Clinically Important Difference [J].
Tilson, Julie K. ;
Sullivan, Katherine J. ;
Cen, Steven Y. ;
Rose, Dorian K. ;
Koradia, Cherisha H. ;
Azen, Stanley P. ;
Duncan, Pamela W. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2010, 90 (02) :196-208
[50]   Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury [J].
Jimbo, Kazumasa ;
Miyata, Kazuhiro ;
Yuine, Hiroshi ;
Takahama, Kousuke ;
Yoshimura, Tomohiro ;
Shiba, Honoka ;
Yasumori, Taichi ;
Kikuchi, Naohisa ;
Shiraishi, Hideki .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2025, 48 (04) :613-620