Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke

被引:360
作者
Beninato, M
Gill-Body, KM
Salles, S
Stark, PC
Black-Schaffer, RM
Stein, J
机构
[1] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Grad Programs Phys Therapy, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Biostat Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 01期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; sensitivity and specificity; stroke;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FIM instrument in patients poststroke. Design: Prospective case series discharged over a 9-month period. Setting: Long-term acute care hospital. Participants: Patients with stroke (N = 113). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Admission, discharge, and change scores were calculated for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Assessments of clinical change were rated at discharge on a 15-point (-7 to +7) Likert scale by attending physicians, with MCID defined at a cutoff score of 3. The FIM change scores associated with MCID were identified from receiver operating characteristic curves. Bayesian analysis was used to determine the probability of individual patients achieving MCID. Results: FIM change scores associated with MCID were 22, 17, and 3 for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM, respectively. The accuracy of the MCID was greater when subjects were categorized based on admission FIM scores than when considering the sample as a whole. Larger FIM change scores were related to MCID in subjects with lower admission FIM scores. Conclusions: These findings will assist in the interpretation of FIM change scores relative to physicians' assessments of important clinical change.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Clinically Important Difference of the Arm Motor Ability Test in Stroke Survivors [J].
Fulk, George ;
Martin, Rebecca ;
Page, Stephen J. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2017, 31 (03) :272-279
[32]   Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke [J].
Lang, Catherine E. ;
Edwards, Dorothy F. ;
Birkenmeier, Rebecca L. ;
Dromerick, Alexander W. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (09) :1693-1700
[33]   Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of upper extremity outcome measures in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairment: a cross-sectional study [J].
Uchiyama, Yuki ;
Takebayashi, Takashi ;
Takahashi, Kayoko ;
Amano, Satoru ;
Gosho, Masahiko ;
Sakai, Masahiro ;
Hashimoto, Koichi ;
Hachisuka, Kenji ;
Domen, Kazuhisa .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (04) :409-417
[34]   Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis [J].
Gervasoni, Elisa ;
Jonsdottir, Johanna ;
Montesano, Angelo ;
Cattaneo, Davide .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 98 (02) :337-340
[35]   The minimal important difference for the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients in the subacute stage [J].
Lien, Hung-Pin ;
Shieh, Yun-Jer ;
Chen, Chih-Ping ;
Huang, Yi-Jing ;
Wang, Inga ;
Chen, Mei-Hsiang ;
Hsieh, Ching-Lin .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 28 (01)
[36]   Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke [J].
Guzik, Agnieszka ;
Druzbicki, Mariusz ;
Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina ;
Turolla, Andrea ;
Kiper, Pawel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (10) :1-14
[37]   The minimal clinically important difference in Berg Balance Scale scores among patients with early subacute stroke: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study [J].
Tamura, Shuntaro ;
Miyata, Kazuhiro ;
Kobayashi, Sota ;
Takeda, Ren ;
Iwamoto, Hiroaki .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (06) :423-429
[38]   Responsiveness, Minimal Detectable Change, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Improved Performance After Stroke Rehabilitation [J].
Wu, Ching-yi ;
Chuang, Li-ling ;
Lin, Keh-chung ;
Lee, Shin-da ;
Hong, Wei-hsien .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (08) :1281-1287
[39]   Minimal clinically important difference of modified dynamic gait index in people with neurological disorders [J].
Corrini, Chiara ;
Torchio, Alessandro ;
Anastasi, Denise ;
Parelli, Riccardo ;
Meotti, Matteo ;
Spedicato, Albino ;
Groppo, Elisabetta ;
D'Arma, Alessia ;
Grosso, Cristina ;
Montesano, Angelo ;
Cattaneo, Davide ;
Gervasoni, Elisa .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2021, 90 :210-214
[40]   Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease [J].
Lemay, Kyle R. ;
Tulloch, Heather E. ;
Pipe, Andrew L. ;
Reed, Jennifer L. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2019, 39 (06) :E6-E11