Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke

被引:358
作者
Beninato, M
Gill-Body, KM
Salles, S
Stark, PC
Black-Schaffer, RM
Stein, J
机构
[1] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Grad Programs Phys Therapy, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Biostat Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 01期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; sensitivity and specificity; stroke;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FIM instrument in patients poststroke. Design: Prospective case series discharged over a 9-month period. Setting: Long-term acute care hospital. Participants: Patients with stroke (N = 113). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Admission, discharge, and change scores were calculated for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Assessments of clinical change were rated at discharge on a 15-point (-7 to +7) Likert scale by attending physicians, with MCID defined at a cutoff score of 3. The FIM change scores associated with MCID were identified from receiver operating characteristic curves. Bayesian analysis was used to determine the probability of individual patients achieving MCID. Results: FIM change scores associated with MCID were 22, 17, and 3 for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM, respectively. The accuracy of the MCID was greater when subjects were categorized based on admission FIM scores than when considering the sample as a whole. Larger FIM change scores were related to MCID in subjects with lower admission FIM scores. Conclusions: These findings will assist in the interpretation of FIM change scores relative to physicians' assessments of important clinical change.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the sitting balance scale and function in sitting test in people with stroke [J].
Alzyoud, Jehad ;
Medley, Ann ;
Thompson, Mary ;
Csiza, Linda .
PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) :327-336
[22]   Minimal clinically important difference of Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (GAIT) in patients with sub-acute stroke [J].
Saengsuwan, Jittima ;
Vichiansiri, Ratana .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2021, 57 (06) :874-878
[23]   Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study [J].
Hayashi, Shota ;
Miyata, Kazuhiro ;
Takeda, Ren ;
Iizuka, Takamitsu ;
Igarashi, Tatsuya ;
Usuda, Shigeru .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (11) :1512-1523
[24]   A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke [J].
Chen, Hao-ling ;
Lin, Keh-chung ;
Hsieh, Yu-wei ;
Wu, Ching-yi ;
Liing, Rong-jiuan ;
Chen, Chia-ling .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (01) :75-83
[25]   Minimal clinically important difference in postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer [J].
Hara, Tsuyoshi ;
Kogure, Eisuke ;
Iijima, Shinno ;
Fukawa, Yasuhisa ;
Kubo, Akira ;
Kakuda, Wataru .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (03) :2197-2205
[26]   The minimal clinically important difference of the motricity index score [J].
Lin, Chen ;
Arevalo, Yurany A. ;
Harvey, Richard L. ;
Prabhakaran, Shyam ;
Martin, Kimberly D. .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (03) :298-303
[27]   Minimal clinically important difference in postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer [J].
Tsuyoshi Hara ;
Eisuke Kogure ;
Shinno Iijima ;
Yasuhisa Fukawa ;
Akira Kubo ;
Wataru Kakuda .
Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 :2197-2205
[28]   A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke [J].
Beauchamp, Marla K. ;
Niebuhr, Rudy ;
Roche, Patricia ;
Kirkwood, Renata ;
Sibley, Kathryn M. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (08) :1207-1215
[29]   Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Comfortable Speed as a Measure of Gait Performance in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Rehabilitation after Stroke [J].
Bohannon, Richard W. ;
Andrews, A. Williams ;
Glenney, Susan S. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (10) :1223-1225
[30]   The Wisconsin gait scale - The minimal clinically important difference [J].
Guzik, Agnieszka ;
Druzbickia, Mariusz ;
Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina ;
Przysada, Grzegorz ;
Kwolek, Andrzej .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 68 :453-457