Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke

被引:351
作者
Beninato, M
Gill-Body, KM
Salles, S
Stark, PC
Black-Schaffer, RM
Stein, J
机构
[1] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Grad Programs Phys Therapy, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Biostat Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 01期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; sensitivity and specificity; stroke;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FIM instrument in patients poststroke. Design: Prospective case series discharged over a 9-month period. Setting: Long-term acute care hospital. Participants: Patients with stroke (N = 113). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Admission, discharge, and change scores were calculated for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Assessments of clinical change were rated at discharge on a 15-point (-7 to +7) Likert scale by attending physicians, with MCID defined at a cutoff score of 3. The FIM change scores associated with MCID were identified from receiver operating characteristic curves. Bayesian analysis was used to determine the probability of individual patients achieving MCID. Results: FIM change scores associated with MCID were 22, 17, and 3 for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM, respectively. The accuracy of the MCID was greater when subjects were categorized based on admission FIM scores than when considering the sample as a whole. Larger FIM change scores were related to MCID in subjects with lower admission FIM scores. Conclusions: These findings will assist in the interpretation of FIM change scores relative to physicians' assessments of important clinical change.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the sitting balance scale and function in sitting test in people with stroke
    Alzyoud, Jehad
    Medley, Ann
    Thompson, Mary
    Csiza, Linda
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) : 327 - 336
  • [22] Minimal clinically important difference of Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (GAIT) in patients with sub-acute stroke
    Saengsuwan, Jittima
    Vichiansiri, Ratana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2021, 57 (06) : 874 - 878
  • [23] Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study
    Hayashi, Shota
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Takeda, Ren
    Iizuka, Takamitsu
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    Usuda, Shigeru
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 36 (11) : 1512 - 1523
  • [24] A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke
    Chen, Hao-ling
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Hsieh, Yu-wei
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Liing, Rong-jiuan
    Chen, Chia-ling
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [25] Minimal clinically important difference in postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer
    Hara, Tsuyoshi
    Kogure, Eisuke
    Iijima, Shinno
    Fukawa, Yasuhisa
    Kubo, Akira
    Kakuda, Wataru
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (03) : 2197 - 2205
  • [26] Minimal clinically important difference in postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer
    Tsuyoshi Hara
    Eisuke Kogure
    Shinno Iijima
    Yasuhisa Fukawa
    Akira Kubo
    Wataru Kakuda
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 2197 - 2205
  • [27] The minimal clinically important difference of the motricity index score
    Lin, Chen
    Arevalo, Yurany A.
    Harvey, Richard L.
    Prabhakaran, Shyam
    Martin, Kimberly D.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2023, 30 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [28] A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke
    Beauchamp, Marla K.
    Niebuhr, Rudy
    Roche, Patricia
    Kirkwood, Renata
    Sibley, Kathryn M.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (08) : 1207 - 1215
  • [29] Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Comfortable Speed as a Measure of Gait Performance in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Rehabilitation after Stroke
    Bohannon, Richard W.
    Andrews, A. Williams
    Glenney, Susan S.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (10) : 1223 - 1225
  • [30] The Wisconsin gait scale - The minimal clinically important difference
    Guzik, Agnieszka
    Druzbickia, Mariusz
    Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
    Przysada, Grzegorz
    Kwolek, Andrzej
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 68 : 453 - 457