Patterns of Cognitive Test Scores and Symptom Complaints in Persons with TBI Who Failed Performance Validity Testing

被引:8
作者
Sherer, Mark [1 ]
Sander, Angelle M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ponsford, Jennie [4 ]
Vos, Leia [5 ,6 ]
Poritz, Julia M. P. [7 ]
Ngan, Esther [8 ]
Novelo, Luis Leon [8 ]
机构
[1] TIRR Mem Hermann, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, H Ben Taub Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Harris Hlth Syst, Houston, TX USA
[4] Monash Univ, Monash Epworth Rehabil Res Ctr, Sch Psychol Sci, Turner Inst Brain & Mental Hlth,Epworth Healthcar, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Zablocki Milwaukee VA Med Ctr, Acute Mental Hlth, Neuropsychol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[6] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Psychiat & Behav Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[7] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[8] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Performance validity; Traumatic brain injury; Cognitive tests; Self-report questionnaires; Subgroups; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; AMERICAN ACADEMY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617720000351
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine clinically meaningful subgroups of persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who have failed performance validity testing. Method: Study participants were selected from a cohort of 674 participants with definitive medical evidence of TBI. Participants were those who failed performance validity testing (the Word Memory Test, using the standard cutoffs). Participants were administered cognitive tests and self-report questionnaires. Test and questionnaire results were summarized as 12 dimension scores. Cluster analysis using the k-means method was performed. Results: Cluster analysis for the 143 retained participants indicated three subgroups. These subgroups differed on patterns of scores. Subgroup 1 was impaired for memory and had no excessive complaints. Subgroup 2 had impaired memory and processing speed as well as concern regarding cognition function. Subgroup 3 showed impairment on all cognitive tests and excess complaints in multiple areas. Conclusions: These results provide a preliminary basis for improved understanding of poor performance validity.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 938
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IEEE T ENERGY CONVER, V22, P197
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, LA VENTANA, V10, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1958, EXAMIN CLIN PSYCHOL
[4]   Comparisons of Five Performance Validity Indices in Bona Fide and Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Bashem, Jesse R. ;
Rapport, Lisa J. ;
Miller, Justin B. ;
Hanks, Robin A. ;
Axelrod, Bradley N. ;
Millis, Scott R. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2014, 28 (05) :851-875
[5]   Symptom validity assessment:: Practice issues and medical necessity -: NAN policy & planning committee [J].
Bush, SS ;
Ruff, RM ;
Tröster, AI ;
Barth, JT ;
Koffler, SP ;
Pliskin, NH ;
Reynolds, CR ;
Silver, CH .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 20 (04) :419-426
[6]  
Caliski T., 1974, Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/03610927408827101
[7]   Official Position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration Policy on Validity Testing: Guidance and Recommendations for Change [J].
Chafetz, M. D. ;
Williams, M. A. ;
Ben-Porath, Y. S. ;
Bianchini, K. J. ;
Boone, K. B. ;
Kirkwood, M. W. ;
Larrabee, G. J. ;
Ord, J. S. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 29 (06) :723-740
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Journal Of The American Statistical Association, DOI [DOI 10.2307/2290095, 10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[9]   THE MCMASTER FAMILY ASSESSMENT DEVICE [J].
EPSTEIN, NB ;
BALDWIN, LM ;
BISHOP, DS .
JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 1983, 9 (02) :171-180
[10]   Norms for letter and category fluency: Demographic corrections for age, education, and ethnicity [J].
Gladsjo, JA ;
Schuman, CC ;
Evans, JD ;
Peavy, GM ;
Miller, SW ;
Heaton, RK .
ASSESSMENT, 1999, 6 (02) :147-+