Length of capsular contact on prostate MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension: which is the most optimal sequence?

被引:30
作者
Woo, Sungmin [1 ]
Kim, Sang Youn [1 ]
Cho, Jeong Yeon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Seung Hyup [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Kidney Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Prostate cancer; extracapsular extension; magnetic resonance imaging; length of capsular contact; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; INFLUENCES BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; CANCER DETECTION; BIOPSY; IMPACT; VOLUME; GRADE;
D O I
10.1177/0284185116658684
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Length of capsular contact (LCC) is a promising biomarker for predicting extracapsular extension (ECE), but the most optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence for measuring LCC is yet to be determined. Purpose: To evaluate LCC using different MRI sequences for determining ECE in prostate cancer. Material and Methods: A total of 185 patients underwent prostate MRI followed by radical prostatectomy. LCC was measured separately on T2-weighted (T2W) images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and dynamic contrastenhanced (DCE) MRI. LCCs (LCCT2, LCCADC, LCCDCE, and LCCmax [greatest value of 3 LCCs]) were compared between sequences using Wilcoxon signed rank test and was tested for determining ECE using the Mann-Whitney U test, ROC curve analysis, and logistic regression analysis. Results: There were no significant differences among LCCs (P = 0.333-0.837). All LCCs were significantly greater in patients with ECE (P< 0.001). The optimal threshold value for predicting ECE was > 14, > 13, > 12, and > 14mm for LCCT2, LCCADC, LCCDCE, and LCCmax, respectively. LCCmax yielded the highest area under the curve (0.895) which was significantly greater than that by LCCADC (0.858, P = 0.030). Otherwise, there were no significant difference between LCCs (P = 0.052-0.985). At univariate analysis, age, clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score, and all LCCs were significantly associated with ECE (P< 0.001-0.040). At multivariate analysis, GS (P <= 0.008) and all LCCs (P< 0.001) were independently predictive factors. Conclusion: LCC measured on any sequence was significantly different in patients with and without ECE and was independently associated with the presence of ECE. Although LCCmax showed the greatest ability to predict ECE, there was relatively equivalent performance among different MRI sequences.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Predictive Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determined Tumor Contact Length for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer [J].
Baco, Eduard ;
Rud, Erik ;
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ;
Svindland, Aud ;
Eggesbo, Heidi B. ;
Hung, Andrew J. ;
Matsugasumi, Toru ;
Bernhard, Jean-Christophe ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Ukimura, Osamu .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (02) :466-472
[2]   Extent of Extraprostatic Extension Independently Influences Biochemical Recurrence-free Survival: Evidence for Further pT3 Subclassification [J].
Ball, Mark W. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (01) :161-164
[3]   PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know [J].
Barrett, T. ;
Turkbey, B. ;
Choyke, P. L. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) :1165-1176
[4]   Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Ruutu, Mirja ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Stark, Jennifer R. ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Bratell, Stefan ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (18) :1708-1717
[5]   How Accurate Is Multiparametric MR Imaging in Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Volume? [J].
Bratan, Flavie ;
Melodelima, Christelle ;
Souchon, Remi ;
Au Hoang Dinh ;
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence ;
Crouzet, Sebastien ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Gelet, Albert ;
Rouviere, Olivier .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (01) :144-154
[6]   Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Jager, GJ ;
Laheij, RJ ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
van Lier, HJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) :2294-2302
[7]   Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Godoy, Guilherme ;
Tareen, Basir U. ;
Lepor, Herbert .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (11) :1610-1614
[8]   Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection [J].
Haffner, Jeremie ;
Lemaitre, Laurent ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Leroy, Xavier ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Villers, Arnauld .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E171-E178
[9]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[10]   Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue [J].
Hosseinzadeh, K ;
Schwarz, SD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (04) :654-661