A generalized multistate-based path vector approach to multistate two-terminal reliability

被引:66
作者
Ramirez-Marquez, JE [1 ]
Coit, DW
Tortorella, M
机构
[1] Stevens Inst Technol, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07408170500341270
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The two-terminal reliability problem assumes that a network and its elements are either in a working or a failed state. However, many practical networks are built of elements that may operate in more than two states i.e., elements may be degraded but still functional. Multistate two-terminal reliability at demand level d (M2TR(d)) can be defined as the probability that the system capacity generated by multistate components is greater than or equal to a demand of d units. This paper presents a fully multistate-based algorithm that obtains the multistate equivalent of binary path sets, namely, Multistate Minimal Path Vectors (MMPVs), for the M2TRd problem. The algorithm mimics natural organisms in the sense that a select number of arcs inherit information from other specific arcs contained in a special set called the "primary set." The algorithm is tested and compared with published results in the literature. Two features of the algorithm make it relevant: (i) unlike other approaches, it does not depend on an a priori knowledge of the binary path sets to obtain the MMPVs; and (ii) the use of an information sharing approach and network reduction technique significantly reduce the number of vector analyses needed to obtain all the component levels that guarantee system success. Additionally, the complexities associated with the computation of reliability are discussed. A Monte Carlo simulation approach is used to obtain an accurate estimate of actual M2TR values based on MMPVs. Examples are used to validate the algorithm and the simulation procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 488
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   RELIABILITY EVALUATION OF MULTISTATE SYSTEMS WITH MULTISTATE COMPONENTS [J].
AVEN, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1985, 34 (05) :473-479
[2]   2 NEW COMPONENT IMPORTANCE MEASURES FOR A FLOW NETWORK SYSTEM [J].
AVEN, T ;
OSTEBO, R .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1986, 14 (01) :75-80
[3]  
Ball M., 1977, Annals of Discrete Mathematics, V1, P49
[4]   CALCULATING BOUNDS ON REACHABILITY AND CONNECTEDNESS IN STOCHASTIC NETWORKS [J].
BALL, MO ;
PROVAN, JS .
NETWORKS, 1983, 13 (02) :253-278
[5]  
Barlow R. E., 1978, Mathematics of Operations Research, V3, P275, DOI 10.1287/moor.3.4.275
[6]   State extension for adequacy evaluation of composite power systems-applications [J].
Billinton, R ;
Zhang, W .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (01) :427-432
[7]   A DECOMPOSITION FOR MULTISTATE MONOTONE SYSTEMS [J].
BLOCK, HW ;
SAVITS, TH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1982, 19 (02) :391-402
[8]   CUSTOMER-DRIVEN RELIABILITY MODELS FOR MULTISTATE COHERENT SYSTEMS [J].
BOEDIGHEIMER, RA ;
KAPUR, KC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1994, 43 (01) :46-50
[9]   EDGE-PACKINGS OF GRAPHS AND NETWORK RELIABILITY [J].
COLBOURN, CJ .
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 1988, 72 (1-3) :49-61
[10]   NEW ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE FOR PROBABILISTIC GRAPHS [J].
DOTSON, WP ;
GOBIEN, JO .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 1979, 26 (10) :855-865