Appropriateness of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease

被引:12
|
作者
Bianco, Aida [1 ]
Larosa, Elisabetta [1 ]
Pileggi, Claudia [1 ]
Pavia, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Dept Hlth Sci, Catanzaro, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
VERTICAL TRANSMISSION; UNITED-STATES; COLONIZATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; STRATEGIES; AGALACTIAE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0166179
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to describe the adherence to CDC guidelines for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) and to identify possible factors influencing noncompliance with guidelines. We conducted a retrospective study in Italy. Our cohort included women in whom antenatal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening was not performed, was performed, but results were not available at the time of labor or delivery and women who were positive for GBS colonization. The indications for complete execution of IAP according to revised CDC guidelines was evaluated. It was considered adequate when performed with a recommended antibiotic at least four hours prior to delivery. The cohort included 902 women. Among those who had performed rectal and vaginal swabs (or recto-vaginal swabs), results were available in 86.9% of vaginal swabs and in 87.1% of rectal swabs and GBS was detected in 59.8% of vaginal swabs and in 71% of rectal swabs. 49.2% women had indication for GBS prophylaxis. Among these, 91.1% received an antibiotic during labor. Totally appropriate IAP was performed in 36.3% deliveries, an inappropriate antibiotic was administered in 10.4% women, the remaining 45.3% women received partially appropriate IAP; of these, 15.5% had received antibiotics through an inappropriate route of administration, 18.2% an inappropriate dosage regimen. Overall, 27.5% women received intrapartum ampicillin with inappropriate timing. Multivariate analysis showed that totally appropriate prophylaxis was significantly more likely in women who had no previous live birth, who had vaginal delivery, and a positive result at antenatal GBS screening. Despite satisfactory GBS screening implementation, there is still a substantial gap between optimal and actual IAP. We hypothesize that the complexity of the CDC guidelines may partially explain this shortcoming. Future efforts will include initiatives focused at enabling and reinforcing adherence to evidence-based prevention practices.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Duration of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus
    Cate, Jennifer
    Illuzzi, Jessica Lee
    Cayton, Colby
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 10S - 10S
  • [2] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus and risks of unnecessary antibiotics
    Berardi, Alberto
    Ferrari, Fabrizio
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 480 - 480
  • [3] Vaginal group B streptococcus status during intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis
    Scasso, Santiago
    Laufer, Joel
    Rodriguez, Grisel
    Alonso, Justo G.
    Sosa, Claudio G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 129 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [4] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis failure and group-B streptococcus early-onset disease
    Berardi, Alberto
    Lugli, Licia
    Rossi, Cecilia
    China, Mariachiara
    Chiossi, Claudio
    Gambini, Lucia
    Guidi, Battista
    Pedna, Maria Federica
    Piepoli, Marina
    Simoni, Angela
    Ferrari, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (10): : 1221 - 1224
  • [5] Effects of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Neonatal Acquisition of Group B Streptococci
    Toyofuku, Meiwa
    Morozumi, Miyuki
    Hida, Mariko
    Satoh, Yoshitake
    Sakata, Hiroshi
    Shiro, Hiroyuki
    Ubukata, Kimiko
    Murata, Mitsuru
    Iwata, Satoshi
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 190 : 169 - +
  • [6] Intrapartum chemoprophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus infection to prevent neonatal disease: Who should be treated?
    Philipson, EH
    Herson, VC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1996, 13 (08) : 487 - 490
  • [7] <underline/>Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus: what exactly is adequate?
    Coggins, Sarah A.
    Puopolo, Karen M.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2024,
  • [8] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus and risks of unnecessary antibiotics REPLY
    Turrentine, Mark
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 408 - 409
  • [9] Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis
    Schrag, SJ
    Zywicki, S
    Farley, MM
    Reingold, AL
    Harrison, LH
    Lefkowitz, LB
    Hadler, JL
    Danila, R
    Cieslak, PR
    Schuchat, A
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (01): : 15 - 20
  • [10] Intrapartum Group B Streptococcus Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin Allergic Pregnant Women
    Desravines, Nerlyne
    Venkatesh, Kartik
    Hopkins, Austin Mitchell
    Grant, Megan
    McGuire, Colleen
    Boggess, Kim A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 136S - 136S