Comparison of perioperative outcomes in elderly (age ≥ 75 years) vs. younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:28
|
作者
Yamada, Yuta [1 ]
Teshima, Taro [1 ]
Fujimura, Tetsuya [2 ]
Sato, Yusuke [1 ]
Nakamura, Masaki [1 ]
Niimi, Aya [1 ,3 ]
Kimura, Naoki [1 ]
Kakutani, Shigenori [1 ,4 ]
Kawai, Taketo [1 ]
Yamada, Daisuke [1 ]
Suzuki, Motofumi [1 ]
Kume, Haruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Global Hlth, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Mitsui Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; OLDER; RADIOTHERAPY; CONTINENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0234113
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men of age >= 75 years in comparison with younger men. Methods From November 2011 to December 2018, six hundred and thirty patients with prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A total of 614 patients were analyzed after excluding 16 patients who were treated with hormone therapy prior to RARP. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their age (age >= 75 years: N = 46 patients and age < 75 years: N = 568 patients). Perioperative parameters regarding oncologic/functional outcomes and complication status were compared between the 2 groups. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify perioperative complications. Clinical and pathological status including stage, positive margin, continence, and potency status after RARP were analyzed. Results Five-hundred sixty-eight and forty-six men were of age <75 and >= 75 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of oncologic outcomes (positive resection margin rate and PSA failure). The duration of hospitalization was longer in older patients but was not statistically significant (P = 0.051). A total number of Clavien >= 3 complications that occurred within a month after RARP were 15 (2.6%) and 2 (4.3%) in younger men (age < 75 years) and older men (age >= 75 years), respectively (P = 0.359). Conclusion The present study showed that the oncologic and surgical outcomes in the elderly group were similar to those in the younger population. However, the duration of hospitalization seemed to be longer in older patients (age >= 75 years), despite similar complication rates.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [32] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes
    Banno, Taro
    Nakamura, Kazutaka
    Ozaki, Akihiko
    Kouchi, Yukiko
    Ohira, Tadashi
    Shimmura, Hiroaki
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) : 2125 - 2133
  • [33] Comparison and trend of perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: nationwide inpatient sample 2009-2014
    Qin, Yingyi
    Han, Hedong
    Xue, Yongping
    Wu, Cheng
    Wei, Xin
    Liu, Yuzhou
    Cao, Yang
    Ruan, Yiming
    He, Jia
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2020, 46 (05): : 754 - 771
  • [34] Comparison of Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes of Three-Dimensional Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Preliminary Study
    Yilmazel, Fatih Kursat
    Sam, Emre
    Cinislioglu, Ahmet Emre
    Tor, Ibrahim Hakki
    Akkas, Fatih
    Bedir, Fevzi
    Karabulut, Ibrahim
    Aydin, Hasan Riza
    Adanur, Senol
    Polat, Ozkan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (03): : 304 - 309
  • [35] Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Report of the First 10 Cases
    Oshina, Takahiro
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Akiyama, Yoshiyuki
    Kamei, Jun
    Kaneko, Tomoyuki
    Kawai, Taketo
    Obinata, Daisuke
    Yamada, Daisuke
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Takahashi, Satoru
    Kume, Haruki
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (08) : 4762 - 4768
  • [36] Comparison of intra- and postoperative analgesia and pain perception in robot-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy
    Knipper, Sophie
    Hagedorn, Moritz
    Sadat-Khonsari, Maryam
    Tian, Zhe
    Karakiewicz, Pierre, I
    Tilki, Derya
    Heinzer, Hans
    Michl, Uwe
    Steuber, Thomas
    von Breunig, Franziska
    Zoeller, Christian
    Graefen, Markus
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 1451 - 1457
  • [37] Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Sammon, Jesse
    Sun, Maxine
    Ravi, Praful
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Bianchi, Marco
    Jeong, Wooju
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Hansen, Jens
    Schmitges, Jan
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Peabody, James O.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Menon, Mani
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (04) : 679 - 685
  • [38] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [39] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy haemostasis techniques and outcomes
    Wald, Gal
    Winograd, Joshua
    Farha, Mark
    Dudley, Vanessa
    Hu, Jim C.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2024,
  • [40] Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients: A comparison of two high-volume referral centers
    Gandaglia, G.
    Karl, A.
    Novara, G.
    de Groote, R.
    Buchner, A.
    D'Hondt, F.
    Montorsi, F.
    Stief, C.
    Mottrie, A.
    Gratzke, C.
    EJSO, 2016, 42 (11): : 1736 - 1743