Comparison of perioperative outcomes in elderly (age ≥ 75 years) vs. younger men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:28
|
作者
Yamada, Yuta [1 ]
Teshima, Taro [1 ]
Fujimura, Tetsuya [2 ]
Sato, Yusuke [1 ]
Nakamura, Masaki [1 ]
Niimi, Aya [1 ,3 ]
Kimura, Naoki [1 ]
Kakutani, Shigenori [1 ,4 ]
Kawai, Taketo [1 ]
Yamada, Daisuke [1 ]
Suzuki, Motofumi [1 ]
Kume, Haruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Global Hlth, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Mitsui Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; OLDER; RADIOTHERAPY; CONTINENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0234113
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men of age >= 75 years in comparison with younger men. Methods From November 2011 to December 2018, six hundred and thirty patients with prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). A total of 614 patients were analyzed after excluding 16 patients who were treated with hormone therapy prior to RARP. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their age (age >= 75 years: N = 46 patients and age < 75 years: N = 568 patients). Perioperative parameters regarding oncologic/functional outcomes and complication status were compared between the 2 groups. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify perioperative complications. Clinical and pathological status including stage, positive margin, continence, and potency status after RARP were analyzed. Results Five-hundred sixty-eight and forty-six men were of age <75 and >= 75 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of oncologic outcomes (positive resection margin rate and PSA failure). The duration of hospitalization was longer in older patients but was not statistically significant (P = 0.051). A total number of Clavien >= 3 complications that occurred within a month after RARP were 15 (2.6%) and 2 (4.3%) in younger men (age < 75 years) and older men (age >= 75 years), respectively (P = 0.359). Conclusion The present study showed that the oncologic and surgical outcomes in the elderly group were similar to those in the younger population. However, the duration of hospitalization seemed to be longer in older patients (age >= 75 years), despite similar complication rates.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Mazzone, Elio
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [2] Feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men at senior age ≥75 years: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of a high-volume center
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Wagner, Christian
    Schuette, Andreas
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Karagiotis, Theodoros
    Mendrek, Mikolaj
    Rachubinski, Pawel
    Oelke, Matthias
    Tian, Zhe
    Witt, Jorn H.
    AGING MALE, 2022, 25 (01) : 8 - 16
  • [3] Perioperative and Functional Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Octogenarian Men
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Kim, Jessica L.
    Eldred, Nancy
    Liang, Karren
    Huynh, Linda M.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Patel, Vipul
    Lee, David I.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (07) : 1025 - 1029
  • [4] Application of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men over 75 years: an analysis of comparative outcomes
    Xia, Zhongyou
    Fu, Xueqin
    Li, Jinze
    Yuan, Xinzhu
    Wu, Ji
    Tang, Lingtong
    AGING MALE, 2023, 26 (01)
  • [5] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in indian men of age 75 years and above: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Carbin, Danny Darlington
    Tamhankar, Ashwin Sunil
    Ahluwalia, Puneet
    Gautam, Gagan
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04) : 799 - 806
  • [6] An Open Radical Prostatectomy Approach That Mimics the Technique of Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes
    Ozkaptan, Orkunt
    Balaban, Muhsin
    Sevinc, Cuneyd
    Karadeniz, Tahir
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (02) : 168 - 173
  • [7] Oncologic and patient-reported outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged ≥75 years
    Togashi, Kyo
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Okamoto, Teppei
    Kojima, Yuta
    Iwamura, Hiromichi
    Fujita, Naoki
    Narita, Takuma
    Hamano, Itsuto
    Hamaya, Tomoko
    Yoneyama, Tohru
    Yamamoto, Hayato
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
    Ohyama, Chikara
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (10) : 729.e17 - 729.e25
  • [8] Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Arikan, Yusuf
    Eksi, Mithat
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 1027 - 1035
  • [9] Survival outcomes in elderly men undergoing radical prostatectomy in Australia
    Ranasinghe, Weranja
    Wang, Luke L.
    Persad, Raj
    Bolton, Damien
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Sengupta, Shomik
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (03) : E189 - E193
  • [10] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged ≥70 years
    Greco, Kristin A.
    Meeks, Joshua J.
    Wu, Simon
    Nadler, Robert B.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) : 1492 - 1495