A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure

被引:13
作者
Somri, Mostafa [1 ,2 ]
Vaida, Sonia [4 ]
Garcia Fornari, Gustavo [5 ,7 ]
Renee Mendoza, Gabriela [5 ,7 ]
Charco-Mora, Pedro [6 ,7 ]
Hawash, Naser [1 ,2 ]
Matter, Ibrahim [2 ,3 ]
Swaid, Forat [2 ,3 ]
Gaitini, Luis [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Anesthesiol, Bnai Zion Med Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Bruce & Ruth Rappaport Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Surg, Bnai Zion Med Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[4] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Hershey, PA USA
[5] Hosp Univ Italiano, Dept Anesthesiol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[6] Hosp Univ Valencia, Dept Anesthesiol, Valencia, Spain
[7] Int Program Teaching & Invest Airway Management F, Haifa, Israel
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Laryngeal tube; Supreme laryngeal mask airway; Oropharyngeal seal pressure; ADULT PATIENTS; LEAK PRESSURE; CUFF POSITION; LMA SUPREME; ANESTHESIA; PROSEAL; INSERTION; VENTILATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-016-0237-7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D) and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (SLMA) are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with an added channel to allow gastric drainage. We studied the efficacy of these devices when using pressure controlled mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for short and medium duration surgical procedures and compared the oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and-neck positions. Methods: Eighty patients in each group had either LTS-D or SLMA for airway management. The patients were recruited in two different institutions. Primary outcome variables were the oropharyngeal seal pressures in neutral, flexion, extension, right and left head-neck position. Secondary outcome variables were time to achieve an effective airway, ease of insertion, number of attempts, maneuvers necessary during insertion, ventilatory parameters, success of gastric tube insertion and incidence of complications. Results: The oropharyngeal seal pressure achieved with the LTS-D was higher than the SLMA in, (extension (p=0.0150) and right position (p=0.0268 at 60 cm H2O intracuff pressures and nearly significant in neutral position (p = 0.0571). The oropharyngeal seal pressure was significantly higher with the LTS-D during neck extension as compared to SLMA (p= 0.015). Similar oropharyngeal seal pressures were detected in all other positions with each device. The secondary outcomes were comparable between both groups. Patients ventilated with LTS-D had higher incidence of sore throat (p = 0.527). No major complications occurred. Conclusions: Better oropharyngeal seal pressure was achieved with the LTS-D in head-neck right and extension positions, although it did not appear to have significance in alteration of management using pressure control mechanical ventilation in neutral position. The fiberoptic view was better with the SLMA. The post-operative sore throat incidence was higher in the LTS-D.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   LMA Supreme™ Versus Facemask Ventilation Performed by Novices: A Comparative Study in Morbidly Obese Patients Showing Difficult Ventilation Predictors [J].
Abdi, Widad ;
Dhonneur, Gilles ;
Amathieu, Roland ;
Adhoum, Anis ;
Kamoun, Walid ;
Slavov, Velislav ;
Barrat, Christophe ;
Combes, Xavier .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2009, 19 (12) :1624-1630
[2]  
Agrò F, 2002, CAN J ANAESTH, V49, P867, DOI 10.1007/BF03017422
[3]  
ASAI T, 1994, BRIT J ANAESTH, V72, P366, DOI 10.1093/bja/72.3.366
[4]   The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Belena, Jose M. ;
Gracia, Jose L. ;
Ayala, Jose L. ;
Nunez, Monica ;
Lorenzo, Jose A. ;
de los Reyes, Agustin ;
Perez, Jose L. ;
Yuste, Javier .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2011, 23 (06) :456-460
[5]   The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study [J].
Bergmann, Ingo ;
Crozier, Thomas Allen ;
Roessler, Markus ;
Schotola, Hanna ;
Mansur, Ashham ;
Buettner, Benedikt ;
Hinz, Jose Maria ;
Bauer, Martin .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 14
[6]   An evaluation of the factors influencing selection of the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway in normal adults [J].
Berry, AM ;
Brimacombe, JR ;
McManus, KF ;
Goldblatt, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (06) :565-570
[7]  
BRIMACOMBE J, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P457
[8]   Stability of the LMA-ProSeal® and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions:: a randomized crossover study [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (01) :65-69
[9]   Evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients [J].
Cook, T. M. ;
Gatward, J. J. ;
Handel, J. ;
Hardy, R. ;
Thompson, C. ;
Srivastava, R. ;
Clarke, P. A. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (05) :555-562
[10]   Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal® laryngeal mask airway with laryngeal Tube Sonda® during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation [J].
Cook, TM ;
Cranshaw, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (02) :261-266