2016: Reviewing for Radiology-Reporting Guidelines and Why We Use Them

[11] Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):

[12] Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (02): : 218 - 228

[13] Why most published research findings are false [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) : 696 - 701

[14] Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (01) : 6 - 10

[15] Spin in Radiology Research: Let the Data Speak for Themselves [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 324 - 325

[16] McInnes MDF, 2015, RADIOLOGY, V277, P927, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2015154033

[17] Moher D, 2015, SYST REV-LONDON, V4, DOI [10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007]

[18] Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (09) : 1105 - 1107

[19] Assessing the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Cancer [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) : 67 - 73

[20] Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 185 (05) : 263 - 267

[11] Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):

[12] Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (02): : 218 - 228

[13] Why most published research findings are false [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) : 696 - 701

[14] Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (01) : 6 - 10

[15] Spin in Radiology Research: Let the Data Speak for Themselves [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 324 - 325

[16] McInnes MDF, 2015, RADIOLOGY, V277, P927, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2015154033

[17] Moher D, 2015, SYST REV-LONDON, V4, DOI [10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007]

[18] Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (09) : 1105 - 1107

[19] Assessing the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Cancer [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) : 67 - 73

[20] Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 185 (05) : 263 - 267