Acid properties of fulvic and humic acids isolated from two acid forest soils under different vegetation cover and soil depth

被引:30
作者
Lopez, R. [2 ]
Gondar, D. [1 ]
Iglesias, A. [1 ]
Fiol, S. [1 ]
Antelo, J. [1 ]
Arce, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Quim, Dept Quim Fis, E-15782 Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] CSIC, Inst Invest Agrobiol Galicia, E-15780 Santiago De Compostela, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01048.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
We studied the acid-base properties of 16 fulvic acids and 16 humic acids isolated from the surface (3-15 cm) and subsurface (> 45 cm) horizons of two types of acid forest soils, derived respectively from amphibolite and granite rocks, under five different types of vegetation. The observed differences between the contents of humic substances in the two types of soils were related to the degree of Al-saturation of the soil organic matter, as indicated by the molar ratio between pyrophosphate extractable Al and C. Humic fractions were characterized in terms of elemental composition, and CPMAS C-13 NMR spectrometry. The contents of carboxylic and phenolic groups were estimated by potentiometric titrations conducted in 0.1 M KNO3 in a nitrogen atmosphere. The fulvic acids contained more carboxylic groups but less phenolic groups than the humic acids: the ratio of phenolic to carboxylic groups in the humic acids was 0.48 +/- 0.10 and in the fulvic acids 0.23 +/- 0.05. The mean values of the protonation constants of each of the humic substance fractions can be used as generic parameters for describing the proton binding properties. The fulvic acids isolated from the subsurface horizon of the soil contained between 2.6 and 23% more carboxylic groups, and the humic acids between 8 and 43% more carboxylic groups than those isolated from the surface horizon of the same soil.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 899
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Kogel-Knabner I., 1993, Soil Biochemistry, V8, P101
[12]   The principles of humic substances [J].
MacCarthy, P .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2001, 166 (11) :738-751
[13]   Statistical analysis of published carbon-13 CPMAS NMR spectra of soil organic matter [J].
Mahieu, N ;
Powlson, DS ;
Randall, EW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (02) :307-319
[14]  
MALCOLM RL, 1989, HUMIC SUBSTANCES, V2, P339
[15]   Recent advances in the application of 13C and 15N NMR spectroscopy to soil organic matter studies [J].
Mathers, NJ ;
Mao, XA ;
Xu, ZH ;
Saffigna, PG ;
Berners-Price, SJ ;
Perera, MCS .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (04) :769-787
[16]   THE USE OF GLASS ELECTRODES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FORMATION-CONSTANTS .1. A DEFINITIVE METHOD FOR CALIBRATION [J].
MAY, PM ;
WILLIAMS, DR ;
LINDER, PW ;
TORRINGTON, RG .
TALANTA, 1982, 29 (04) :249-256
[17]   Generic NICA-Donnan model parameters for proton binding by humic substances [J].
Milne, CJ ;
Kinniburgh, DG ;
Tipping, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (10) :2049-2059
[18]   Proton-binding study of standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids, and natural organic matter [J].
Ritchie, JD ;
Perdue, EM .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 67 (01) :85-96
[19]  
Swift R. S., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods., P1011
[20]   pH buffering in acidic soils developed under Picea abies and Quercus robur -: effects of soil organic matter, adsorbed cations and soil solution ionic strength [J].
Skyllberg, U ;
Raulund-Rasmussen, K ;
Borggaard, OK .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 56 (01) :51-74