Reframing Business Sustainability Decision-Making with Value-Focussed Thinking

被引:22
作者
Benkert, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Swinburne Business Sch, John St, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
关键词
Business sustainability; Cognitive frames; Decision-making; Value-focussed thinking; Holistic thinking; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; COGNITIVE FRAMES; SUPPLY CHAIN; MANAGERIAL; MANAGEMENT; CONTEXT; CAPABILITIES; PERFORMANCE; TENSIONS; PROMISE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-020-04611-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Per definition business sustainability demands the integration of environmental, social, and economic outcomes. Yet, managerial decision-making involving sustainability objectives is fraught with tension and the way managerial decision-makers frame sustainability issues in their mindset influences how sustainability tensions are managed at the organisational level. In the bid to better understand what types of managerial mindsets, or cognitive frames, foster integrative business sustainability practices that simultaneously advance environmental, social, and economic objectives, extant research has focussed on the underlying logics that drive the acknowledgement of sustainability tensions. However, the existing logics-based constructs do not sufficiently explain this link, and it has been suggested that managers perceive and manage sustainability tensions based on the values that they hold. To clarify the roles of managerial values and logics as antecedents in business sustainability decision-making, we integrate Keeney's value-focussed thinking approach with managerial and organisational cognition perspectives. Drawing on data from a survey with 169 senior procurement managers in Australia we found three types of cognitive frames which demonstrate that stronger sustainability values are associated with a more holistic perception of sustainability tensions and vice versa. We also found that managers' cognitive framing of sustainability is strengthened by more holistic organisational cognitive frames and discuss according implications for managerial decision-making in theory and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 456
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]   Decision theory in sustainable supply chain management: a literature review [J].
Alexander, Anthony ;
Walker, Helen ;
Naim, Mohamed .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2014, 19 (5-6) :504-522
[3]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[4]   SIMILAR BUT NOT THE SAME: DIFFERENTIATING CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY FROM CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
Song, Hee-Chan .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2017, 11 (01) :105-149
[5]   COGNITIVE CHANGE, STRATEGIC ACTION, AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL [J].
BARR, PS ;
STIMPERT, JL ;
HUFF, AS .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1992, 13 :15-36
[6]   Two snapshots reinforcing systemic thinking and responsibility [J].
Barter, Nick ;
Russell, Sally .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2014, 5 (01) :45-54
[7]   Systemic corporate social responsibility: micro-to-macro transitions, collective outcomes and self-regulation [J].
Beal, Brent D. ;
Neesham, Cristina .
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2016, 12 (02) :209-227
[8]   Mainstrearning corporate social responsibility: Developing markets for virtue [J].
Berger, Ida E. ;
Cunningham, Peggy H. ;
Drurmuright, Minette E. .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 49 (04) :132-+
[9]  
Best S.J., 2004, INTERNET DATA COLLEC
[10]  
Best S.J., 2009, APPL SOCIAL RES METH