Method and the speculative sentence in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit

被引:0
作者
Becker, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] New Sch Social Res, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10011 USA
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2019年
关键词
Hegel; German idealism; Phenomenology of Spirit; method; speculative sentence; immanent critique;
D O I
10.1080/0020174X.2019.1610053
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While Hegel's discussion of the 'speculative sentence' occurs in the 'Preface' to the Phenomenology of Spirit, commentators rarely link it to the larger program of this text. Instead, this discussion has typically been received as a guide to the Science of Logic's presentation, as an independent theory of judgment, or as a reflection on the constraints and capacities of language generally. In this paper I argue that the speculative sentence can and should be linked to the Phenomenology itself. Specifically, I show that Hegel's discussion both mirrors and supplements the 'Introduction's' explication of immanent phenomenological method. Establishing this parallel in turn allows us to identify a class of sentences throughout the Phenomenology as properly speculative and methodologically substantive. At the same time, this interpretation helps clarify several characteristics that Hegel ascribes to the speculative sentence, but which have gone unaddressed by commentators.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 470
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, Faith and Knowledge
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1981, HEGEL SOCIOLOGY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1989, SUBLIME OBJECT IDEOL
  • [4] Becker Michael A., 2018, HEGELBULLETIN
  • [5] Becker Michael A., 2018, INT J PHILOS STUDIES
  • [6] Bowman Brady., 2013, HEGEL METAPHYSICS AB
  • [7] Forster MichaelN., 1998, Hegel's Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit
  • [8] Gadamer Hans-Georg., 1976, Hegel's Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies
  • [9] Gasche Rodolphe., 1986, The Tain of the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection
  • [10] Logic and Ontology in Hegel's Theory of Predication
    Harrelson, Kevin J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 23 (04) : 1259 - 1280