Student differences in regulation strategies and their use of learning resources: implications for educational design

被引:14
作者
Bos, Nynke [1 ]
Brand-Gruwel, Saskia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Open Univ Netherlands, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Heerlen, Netherlands
来源
LAK '16 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE, | 2016年
关键词
Individual differences; regulation strategies; blended learning; cluster analysis; learning dispositions; TOOL-USE; ANALYTICS; ACHIEVEMENT; DISCUSSIONS; PERFORMANCE; HYPERMEDIA; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1145/2883851.2883890
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The majority of the learning analytics research focuses on the prediction of course performance and modeling student behaviors with a focus on identifying students who are at risk of failing the course. Learning analytics should have a stronger focus on improving the quality of learning for all students, not only identifying at risk students. In order to do so, we need to understand what successful patterns look like when reflected in data and subsequently adjust the course design to avoid unsuccessful patterns and facilitate successful patterns. However, when establishing these successful patterns, it is important to account for individual differences among students since previous research has shown that not all students engage with learning resources to the same extent. Regulation strategies seem to play an important role in explaining the different usage patterns students' display when using digital learning recourses. When learning analytics research incorporates contextualized data about student regulation strategies we are able to differentiate between students at a more granular level. The current study examined if regulation strategies could account for differences in the use of various learning resources. It examines how students regulated their learning process and subsequently used the different learning resources throughout the course and established how this use contributes to course performance. The results show that students with different regulation strategies use the learning resources to the same extent. However, the use of learning resources influences course performance differently for different groups of students. This paper recognizes the importance of contextualization of learning data resources with a broader set of indicators to understand the learning process. With our focus on differences between students, we strive for a shift within learning analytics from identifying at risk students towards a contribution of learning analytics in the educational design process and enhance the quality of learning; for all students.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 353
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Self-regulation in online learning [J].
Cho, Moon-Heum ;
Shen, Demei .
DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2013, 34 (03) :290-301
[12]  
DAWSON S., 2014, P 4 INT C LEARN AN K, DOI 10.1145/2567574.2567585
[13]  
Drachsler H., 2014, P 4 INT C LEARN AN K, P158, DOI [10.1145/2567574.2567617., DOI 10.1145/2567574.2567617]
[14]   Engineering through students' conceptions of and approaches to learning discussions in face-to-face and online contexts [J].
Ellis, Robert A. ;
Goodyear, Peter ;
Calvo, Rafael A. ;
Prosser, Michael .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2008, 18 (03) :267-282
[15]   The disposition to understand for oneself at university: Integrating learning processes with motivation and metacognition [J].
Entwistle, Noel ;
McCune, Velda .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 83 (02) :267-279
[16]   Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success [J].
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Dawson, Shane ;
Rogers, Tim ;
Gasevic, Danijela .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 28 :68-84
[17]   Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning [J].
Gašević D. ;
Dawson S. ;
Siemens G. .
TechTrends, 2015, 59 (1) :64-71
[18]   Usage reporting on recorded lectures using educational data mining [J].
Gorissen, Pierre ;
van Bruggen, Jan ;
Jochems, Wim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 7 (01) :23-40
[19]  
Inglis M, 2011, J COMPUT ASSIST LEAR, V27, P490, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00417.x, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.0041]
[20]  
Jeris, 2001, P 7 ACM SIGKDD INT C, DOI [10.1145/502512.502549, DOI 10.1145/502512.502549]