Prosocial and proactive "safety citizenship behaviour" (SCB): The mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership

被引:86
作者
Curcuruto, Matteo [1 ]
Griffin, Mark A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Beckett Univ, Sch Social Sci, Portland Way, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Proactivity; Safety behaviour; Organizational citizenship; Organizational support; Affective commitment; Psychological ownership; LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP; WORKPLACE SAFETY; EMPLOYEE SAFETY; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; JOB-SATISFACTION; WORK DESIGN; CLIMATE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.010
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Safety citizenship behaviour (SCB) is an important participation factor in work-groups. Our study aims to study the influence of some antecedents of this safety-specific dimension of organizational citizenship. In the light of the current research stream that distinguishes between prosocial vs. proactive forms of organizational citizenship, we will investigate the effects of the following variables: organizational support for safety participation; team safety climate; psychological ownership toward the management of safety; affective commitment toward the organization. The research was conducted in a multinational chemical industry (N = 314). Prosocial oriented forms of SCE (safety stewardship) were mainly related to the influence of affective dimensions of organizational belongingness (affective commitment). On the other hand, proactive oriented forms of SCB (safety voice) showed higher linkages with the internalization of safety promotion instances (psychological ownership). The conclusions of the article include conceptual implications for academic research and managerial practice. The aim of this is to support a broader safety citizenship orientation by the workforce in the management of safety related instances in the workplace.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Exchange and Power
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ANTECEDENTS CONSEQUE
[3]   Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety [J].
Barling, J ;
Loughlin, C ;
Kelloway, EK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (03) :488-496
[4]  
Barling J, 2000, CAN J ADM SCI, V17, P76
[5]   Fuel of the Self-Starter: How Mood Relates to Proactive Goal Regulation [J].
Bindl, Uta K. ;
Parker, Sharon K. ;
Totterdell, Peter ;
Hagger-Johnson, Gareth .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (01) :134-150
[6]   Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link [J].
Brondino, Margherita ;
Silva, Silvia A. ;
Pasini, Margherita .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (09) :1847-1856
[7]   General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model [J].
Burke, MJ ;
Sarpy, SA ;
Tesluk, PE ;
Smith-Crowe, K .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (02) :429-457
[8]  
Byrne B.M., 2001, Multivariate applications book series.Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications
[9]   Employee perspectives on safety citizenship behaviors and safety violations [J].
Chmiel, Nik ;
Laurent, Julie ;
Hansez, Isabelle .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 93 :96-107
[10]   Workplace Safety: A Meta-Analysis of the Roles of Person and Situation Factors [J].
Christian, Michael S. ;
Bradley, Jill C. ;
Wallace, J. Craig ;
Burke, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (05) :1103-1127