How an international ambidexterity strategy can address the paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese emerging market multinationals

被引:42
作者
Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza [1 ]
Montera, Raffaella [1 ]
Cucari, Nicola [2 ]
Polese, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Management & Innovat Syst, Fisciano, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Via Castro Laurenziano 9, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
China; corporate sustainability; dynamic capabilities; emerging market multinationals; international ambidexterity; paradox perspective; FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES; TRADE-OFFS; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; DYNAMIC CAPABILITY; DIRECT-INVESTMENT; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; FOREIGN; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2490
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate sustainability (CS) is receiving considerable attention from emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs), playing an important role in the globalized market. However, theoretical and empirical knowledge about how EMNEs address CS is still scant, and the relationship between internationalization and CS has not been widely explored. This study aims to fill this gap, evaluating the relationship between an international ambidexterity strategy and CS in EMNEs, which highlighted the paradox perspective. Then we develop three hypotheses in which we argue how the dynamic capabilities underpinning international ambidexterity could be considered a driver of CS in EMNEs. We test the developed hypotheses against data from 300 Chinese EMNEs obtained by a survey. Our results contribute to shape ambidextrous international strategies and to consider CS as a springboard for the strategic intent to systematically and recursively outperform global competition. Testing a measurement scale of international ambidexterity, we suggest structural ambidexterity as a strategic option of internationalization that allows the achievement of economic, social, and environmental sustainability objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2129
页数:20
相关论文
共 121 条
[11]   The corporate challenges of sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2002, 16 (02) :122-131
[12]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[13]   Exploring the influence of resource environments on absorptive capacity development: The case of emerging market firms [J].
Bilgili, Tsvetomira V. ;
Kedia, Ben L. ;
Bilgili, Hansin .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2016, 51 (05) :700-712
[14]   Internalization theory and the performance of emerging-market multinational enterprises [J].
Buckley, Peter J. ;
Tian, Xiaowen .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 26 (05) :976-990
[15]  
Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2017, CHIN INT TRAD INV CO
[16]  
Bureau van Dijk, 2017, CORP OWN COMPL TERM
[17]   Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors' diverse understandings of sustainable development [J].
Byrch, Christine ;
Milne, Markus J. ;
Morgan, Richard ;
Kearins, Kate .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2015, 28 (05) :671-705
[18]   An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment [J].
Cantwell, John ;
Dunning, John H. ;
Lundan, Sarianna M. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (04) :567-586
[19]   Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Gedajlovic, Eric ;
Zhang, Hongping .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :781-796
[20]   Focused and ambidextrous catch-up strategies of emerging economy multinationals [J].
Choi, Yoona ;
Cui, Lin ;
Li, Yi ;
Tian, Xizhou .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 29 (06)