How an international ambidexterity strategy can address the paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese emerging market multinationals

被引:42
作者
Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza [1 ]
Montera, Raffaella [1 ]
Cucari, Nicola [2 ]
Polese, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Management & Innovat Syst, Fisciano, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Via Castro Laurenziano 9, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
China; corporate sustainability; dynamic capabilities; emerging market multinationals; international ambidexterity; paradox perspective; FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES; TRADE-OFFS; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; DYNAMIC CAPABILITY; DIRECT-INVESTMENT; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; FOREIGN; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2490
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate sustainability (CS) is receiving considerable attention from emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs), playing an important role in the globalized market. However, theoretical and empirical knowledge about how EMNEs address CS is still scant, and the relationship between internationalization and CS has not been widely explored. This study aims to fill this gap, evaluating the relationship between an international ambidexterity strategy and CS in EMNEs, which highlighted the paradox perspective. Then we develop three hypotheses in which we argue how the dynamic capabilities underpinning international ambidexterity could be considered a driver of CS in EMNEs. We test the developed hypotheses against data from 300 Chinese EMNEs obtained by a survey. Our results contribute to shape ambidextrous international strategies and to consider CS as a springboard for the strategic intent to systematically and recursively outperform global competition. Testing a measurement scale of international ambidexterity, we suggest structural ambidexterity as a strategic option of internationalization that allows the achievement of economic, social, and environmental sustainability objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2129
页数:20
相关论文
共 121 条
[111]   Embracing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: A Review of Research From Win-Wins and Trade-Offs to Paradoxes and Beyond [J].
Van der Byl, Connie A. ;
Slawinski, Natalie .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 28 (01) :54-79
[112]  
Vera D, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P222, DOI 10.2307/20159030
[113]  
Voinea CL, 2019, ROUTL STUD BUS ETHIC
[114]   Guest editors' introduction - Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution [J].
Volberda, HW ;
Lewin, AY .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2003, 40 (08) :2111-2136
[115]   The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects [J].
Wagner, Marcus .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (07) :1553-1560
[116]   Environmental, Social and Governance Reporting in China [J].
Weber, Olaf .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (05) :303-317
[117]   Executives' Assessments of Evolutionary and Leapfrog Modes: An Ambidexterity Explanation Logic [J].
Xie, Yu ;
Du, Yi-Fei ;
Boadu, Francis ;
Shi, Xuan-Ya .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[118]   Indigenous Characteristics of Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility Conceptual Paradigm [J].
Xu, Shangkun ;
Yang, Rudai .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 93 (02) :321-333
[119]   Institutional Drivers for Corporate Social Responsibility in an Emerging Economy: A Mixed-Method Study of Chinese Business Executives [J].
Yin, Juelin .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2017, 56 (05) :672-704
[120]  
Young W., 2006, Business Strategy and the Environment, V15, P402, DOI [10.1002/bse.510, DOI 10.1002/BSE.510]