How an international ambidexterity strategy can address the paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese emerging market multinationals

被引:42
作者
Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza [1 ]
Montera, Raffaella [1 ]
Cucari, Nicola [2 ]
Polese, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Management & Innovat Syst, Fisciano, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Via Castro Laurenziano 9, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
China; corporate sustainability; dynamic capabilities; emerging market multinationals; international ambidexterity; paradox perspective; FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES; TRADE-OFFS; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; DYNAMIC CAPABILITY; DIRECT-INVESTMENT; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; FOREIGN; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2490
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate sustainability (CS) is receiving considerable attention from emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs), playing an important role in the globalized market. However, theoretical and empirical knowledge about how EMNEs address CS is still scant, and the relationship between internationalization and CS has not been widely explored. This study aims to fill this gap, evaluating the relationship between an international ambidexterity strategy and CS in EMNEs, which highlighted the paradox perspective. Then we develop three hypotheses in which we argue how the dynamic capabilities underpinning international ambidexterity could be considered a driver of CS in EMNEs. We test the developed hypotheses against data from 300 Chinese EMNEs obtained by a survey. Our results contribute to shape ambidextrous international strategies and to consider CS as a springboard for the strategic intent to systematically and recursively outperform global competition. Testing a measurement scale of international ambidexterity, we suggest structural ambidexterity as a strategic option of internationalization that allows the achievement of economic, social, and environmental sustainability objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:2110 / 2129
页数:20
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Alamayreh Esra'a M., 2019, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, V19, P554
[2]   Absorptive capacity and relationship learning mechanisms as complementary drivers of green innovation performance [J].
Albort-Morant, Gema ;
Leal-Rodriguez, Antonio L. ;
De Marchi, Valentina .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 22 (02) :432-452
[3]   Status of corporate sustainability: a content analysis of Fortune 500 companies [J].
Amini, Mehdi ;
Bienstock, Carol C. ;
Narcum, John A. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (08) :1450-1461
[4]   A Sensemaking Approach to Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Human and Ecological Elements of Corporate Sustainability [J].
Angus-Leppan, Tamsin ;
Benn, Suzanne ;
Young, Louise .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (04) :230-244
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J AMBIENT INTELL HUM
[6]  
[Anonymous], EMERGING MULTINATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, South China Morning Post
[8]   How do collaboration and investments in knowledge management affect process innovation in services? [J].
Ashok, Mona ;
Narula, Rajneesh ;
Martinez-Noya, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 20 (05) :1004-1024
[9]   Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms [J].
Awate, Snehal ;
Larsen, Marcus M. ;
Mudambi, Ram .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2015, 46 (01) :63-86
[10]   Unpacking the ambidexterity implementation process in the internationalization of emerging market multinationals [J].
Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo ;
Leme Fleury, Maria Tereza ;
Stefaniak Aveline, Carlos Eduardo ;
Bahia Gama, Marina Amado .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (06) :2005-2017