Comparison of coronary arterial finding by, intravascular ultrasound in patients with "Transient no-reflow" versus "Reflow" during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome

被引:73
作者
Iijima, R [1 ]
Shinji, H [1 ]
Ikeda, N [1 ]
Itaya, H [1 ]
Makino, K [1 ]
Funatsu, A [1 ]
Yokouchi, I [1 ]
Komatsu, H [1 ]
Ito, N [1 ]
Nuruki, H [1 ]
Nakajima, R [1 ]
Nakamura, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Toho Univ, Ohashi Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.104
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Previous studies have shown that transient no-reflow during coronary intervention but with Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow at the completion of the procedure is associated with increased in-hospital and 6-month mortality. We hypothesized that the use of intravascular ultrasound before intervention could identify morphologic features that were predictive of transient no-reflow in patients who had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed 220 patients with ACS who had suitable intravascular ultrasound images that were acquired before intervention. We defined '' transient no-reflow '' as TIMI grade 0, 1, or 2 flow during the procedure and TIMI grade 3 flow at the completion of the procedure. We defined '' reflow '' as good coronary flow (TIMI grade 3 flow) during and after the procedure. Patients were categorized to a transient no-reflow group (n = 20) or a reflow group (n = 200). In the transient no-reflow group, vessel area and amount of plaque burden in the culprit lesion were significantly greater than in the reflow group (vessel 20.8 +/- 5.4 vs 16.4 +/- 6.2 mm(2), P < 0.01; plaque burden 0.90 +/- 0.03 vs 0.83 +/- 0.08, p < 0.001). The presence of ruptured plaque, lipid pool-like images, and thrombus formation were significantly higher in the transient no-reflow group than in the reflow group. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of thrombus formation (odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 20.0, p = 0.04) and larger plaque burden (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.23, p = 0.05) as independent predictors of transient no-reflow. In conclusion, lesion morphologies are different for transient no-reflow and reflow. These findings suggest that the presence of thrombus formation and large plaque burden increase the risk for developing transient no-reflow during coronary intervention for ACS. (c) 200 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Frequency, correlates, and clinical implications of myocardial perfusion after primary angioplasty and stenting, with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Costantini, CO ;
Stone, GW ;
Mehran, R ;
Aymong, E ;
Grines, CL ;
Cox, DA ;
Stuckey, T ;
Turco, M ;
Gersh, BJ ;
Tcheng, JE ;
Garcia, E ;
Griffin, JJ ;
Guagliumi, G ;
Leon, MB ;
Lansky, AJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) :305-312
[2]   The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies [J].
Eeckhout, E ;
Kern, MJ .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (09) :729-739
[3]   Pathology of coronary microembolisation and no reflow [J].
Falk, E ;
Thuesen, L .
HEART, 2003, 89 (09) :983-985
[4]   Fate of unprotected side branches as related to embolic complications during stent implantation for acute coronary syndromes using a distal protection procedure [J].
Iijima, R ;
Tsunoda, T ;
Yamamoto, M ;
Shiba, M ;
Wada, M ;
Tsuji, T ;
Yamamoto, M ;
Nakajima, R ;
Yoshitama, T ;
Hara, H ;
Hara, H ;
Nakamura, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (05) :636-639
[5]   ABILITY OF THE NO-REFLOW PHENOMENON DURING AN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION TO PREDICT LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION AT ONE-MONTH FOLLOW-UP [J].
KENNER, MD ;
ZAJAC, EJ ;
KONDOS, GT ;
DAVE, R ;
WINKELMANN, JW ;
JOFTUS, J ;
LAUCEVICIUS, A ;
KYBARSKIS, A ;
BERUKSTIS, E ;
URBONAS, A ;
FEINSTEIN, SB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 76 (12) :861-868
[6]   Society of cardiac angiography and interventions: Suggested management of the no-reflow phenomenon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory [J].
Klein, LW ;
Kern, MJ ;
Berger, P ;
Sanborn, T ;
Block, P ;
Babb, J ;
Tommaso, C ;
Hodgson, JM ;
Feldman, T .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 60 (02) :194-201
[7]   Comparison of outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes with and without atrial fibrillation [J].
Mehta, RH ;
Dabbous, OH ;
Granger, CB ;
Kuznetsova, P ;
Kline-Rogers, EM ;
Anderson, FA ;
Fox, KAA ;
Gore, JM ;
Goldberg, RJ ;
Eagle, KA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (09) :1031-1036
[8]   American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS) - A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus - Documents developed in collaboration with the European Society of Cardiology endorsed by the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions [J].
Mintz, GS ;
Nissen, SE ;
Anderson, WD ;
Bailey, SR ;
Erbel, R ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Pinto, FJ ;
Rosenfield, K ;
Siegel, RJ ;
Tuzcu, EM ;
Yock, PG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (05) :1478-1492
[9]   Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction [J].
Morishima, I ;
Sone, T ;
Okumura, K ;
Tsuboi, H ;
Kondo, J ;
Mukawa, H ;
Matsui, H ;
Toki, Y ;
Ito, T ;
Hayakawa, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (04) :1202-1209
[10]   No-reflow is an independent predictor of death and myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention [J].
Resnic, FS ;
Wainstein, M ;
Lee, MKY ;
Behrendt, D ;
Wainstein, RV ;
Ohno-Machado, L ;
Kirshenbaum, JM ;
Rogers, CDK ;
Popma, JJ ;
Piana, R .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 145 (01) :42-46