The impact of non-compliance on the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals: A review of the literature

被引:123
作者
Hughes, DA [1 ]
Bagust, A [1 ]
Haycox, A [1 ]
Walley, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Prescribing Res Grp, Liverpool L69 3GE, Merseyside, England
关键词
adherence; compliance; cost-effectiveness; pharmacotherapies;
D O I
10.1002/hec.609
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Non-compliance with drug therapies not only limits their effectiveness, but in some instances, is associated with grave clinical sequelae and substantial economic burden. It is important, therefore, to consider non-compliance in economic evaluations. A review of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, which have applied sensitivity analysis to non-compliance rates, was undertaken to evaluate the impact of non-compliance on the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies. Although 22 evaluations satisfied the inclusion criteria, additional information was obtained from the authors of most studies, as the published details were inadequate. The majority of evaluations assumed altered effectiveness owing to reduced compliance in the absence of supportive clinical evidence. Because of the disparity in the nature of the outcomes, the measures of non-compliance and the time horizon of the studies evaluated, it was not possible to compare the magnitude of the impact of non-compliance among different drug-disease combinations. However, it was evident that non-compliance always results in a reduction in efficacy, but its impact on costs varied substantially. The importance of incorporating measures of compliance is highlighted, as failing to account for 'real world' compliance rates in pharmacoeconomic evaluations may lead to selection of sub-optimal treatment strategies. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 615
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   DISCONTINUATION OF ANTIHYPERLIPIDEMIC DRUGS - DO RATES REPORTED IN CLINICAL-TRIALS REFLECT RATES IN PRIMARY-CARE SETTINGS [J].
ANDRADE, SE ;
WALKER, AM ;
GOTTLIEB, LK ;
HOLLENBERG, NK ;
TESTA, MA ;
SAPERIA, GM ;
PLATT, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (17) :1125-1131
[2]   Persistence of use of lipid-lowering medications - A cross-national study [J].
Avorn, J ;
Monette, J ;
Lacour, A ;
Bohn, RL ;
Monane, M ;
Mogun, H ;
LeLorier, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (18) :1458-1462
[3]   PRIMARY NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PRESCRIBED MEDICATION IN PRIMARY-CARE [J].
BEARDON, PHG ;
MCGILCHRIST, MM ;
MCKENDRICK, AD ;
MCDEVITT, DG ;
MACDONALD, TM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6908) :846-848
[4]   Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of new treatments: efficacy versus effectiveness studies? [J].
Bombardier, C ;
Maetzel, A .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1999, 58 :82-85
[5]   Drug compliance in therapeutic trials: A review [J].
Boudes, P .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 19 (03) :257-268
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of mirtazapine compared to amitriptyline and fluoxetine in the treatment of moderate and severe depression in Austria [J].
Brown, MCJ ;
Nimmerrichter, AA ;
Guest, JF .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 14 (04) :230-244
[7]  
BROWN MG, 1996, THERAPEUTIC EC ASSES
[8]   Cost analysis of once-daily ISMN versus twice-daily ISMN or transdermal patch for nitrate prophylaxis [J].
Brown, RE ;
Kendall, MJ ;
Halpern, MT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 22 (01) :67-76
[9]  
Caro JJ, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V160, P41
[10]  
Clark WF, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V162, P195