Enhanced sensitivity of Dobutamine stress echocardiography by observing wall motion abnormalities during the recovery phase after acute beta-blocker administration

被引:11
作者
Karagiannis, SE [1 ]
Bax, JJ
Elhendy, A
Feringa, HHH
Cokkinos, DV
van Domburg, R
Simoons, M
Poldermans, D
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Cardiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Omaha, Dept Cardiol, Omaha, NE USA
[4] Onassis Cardiac Surg Ctr, Dept Cardiol 1, Athens, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has a modest sensitivity for detecting single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). This study assessed the additional diagnostic value of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery after acute administration of beta blockers. The study population consisted of 200 patients (mean 59 +/- 11 years of age, 144 men), who underwent DSE. Images were acquired at rest, low dose, peak dose, and during recovery. Patients received intravenous metoprolol (1 to 5 mg/min). The dose was adjusted to achieve a recovery heart rate within a 10% range of heart rate at rest. Coronary angiography was performed within 2 months. Inducible new wall motion abnormalities were observed in 168 patients (84%) at peak stress. An additional 14 patients (7%) developed new or worsening wall motion abnormalities during recovery. CAD was detected in 182 patients (86 had single-vessel CAD). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DSE were 88%, 65%, and 73 % at peak stress and 97%, 65%, and 74% during recovery. Sensitivity was particularly higher during recovery than during peak stress in patients with single-vessel CAD (98% vs 81%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, assessment of wall motion abnormalities during the recovery phase after acute beta blockade improves sensitivity of DSE, particularly in patients with single-vessel CAD. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 465
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Stress echocardiography: Recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography
    Armstrong, WF
    Pellikka, PA
    Ryan, T
    Crouse, L
    Zoghbi, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 1998, 11 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [2] BATH C, 1991, AM HEART J, V121, P782
  • [3] EDWARDS WD, 1981, MAYO CLIN PROC, V56, P479
  • [4] Optimal criteria for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography
    Elhendy, A
    van Domburg, RT
    Bax, JJ
    Poldermans, D
    Nierop, PR
    Kasprzak, JD
    Roelandt, JRTC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (11) : 1339 - 1344
  • [5] Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
  • [6] FRISHMAN WH, 1994, HEART, P1271
  • [7] Cardiac events in patients with negative maximal versus negative submaximal dobutamine echocardlograms undergoing noncardiac surgery - Importance of resting wall motion abnormalities
    Labib, SB
    Goldstein, M
    Kinnunen, PM
    Schick, EC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [8] ATTENUATION OF MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA DURING CORONARY-OCCLUSION BY ULTRASHORT-ACTING BETA-ADRENERGIC-BLOCKADE
    LABOVITZ, AJ
    BARTH, C
    CASTELLO, R
    OJILE, M
    KERN, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 121 (05) : 1347 - 1352
  • [9] DRUGS 5 YEARS LATER - DOBUTAMINE
    LEIER, CV
    UNVERFERTH, DV
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1983, 99 (04) : 490 - 496
  • [10] Value of rapid beta-blocker injection at peak dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease
    Mathias, W
    Tsutsui, JM
    Andrade, JL
    Kowatsch, I
    Lemos, PA
    Leal, SMB
    Khandheria, BK
    Ramires, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (09) : 1583 - 1589