Periprostatic infiltration with local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is safe, simple, and effective - A pilot study

被引:14
作者
Bulbul, MA
Haddad, MC
Khauli, RB
Hemady, K
Shaar, A
Khouzami, R
Wazzan, W
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Ctr Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Beirut, Riad Solh, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Beirut, Riad Solh, Lebanon
关键词
prostate; biopsy; anesthesia; ultrasound; transrectal;
D O I
10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00365-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate needle biopsy is the standard procedure to diagnose prostate cancer. It can be associated with significant discomfort and pain. We evaluated if periprostatic infiltration with local anesthetic reduces this discomfort. Material and methods: 72 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy. All patients had 12 cores, with four prostatic zones of biopsies. In 25 consecutive patients (G1) with a median prostate size of 47 cc. no anesthesia was given, while in 47 sequential patients (G2) with a median prostate size of 50 cc, 2 ml of 2% lidocaine was infiltrated in the periprostatic area around the neurovascular bundle using 20-cm-long, 22-gauge needle on both sides as guided by color Doppler. Biopsies were performed in standard fashion. Discomfort was graded on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 meaning no discomfort, 1-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, and 7-10 severe. Results: 12/25 (48%) of G1 patients reported no discomfort compared to 70% in G2 ( P = .025). Mild discomfort was reported in 5/125 (20%) patients of G1 and 9/47 (19%) patients of G2. Moderate or severe discomfort was reported in 8/25 (32%) patients and 5/47 (11%) patients in G2 (P = .039). Prostate size did not affect degree of discomfort within each group and between both subgroups. No adverse reactions were observed secondary to lidocaine infiltration. Conclusion: Periprostatic infiltration with local anesthesia at the time of TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy significantly reduces discomfort. It is easy to perform, safe, and should be considered in all patients irrespective of the prostate size. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 132
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE PROSTATE - COMPLICATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE BY PATIENTS [J].
AUS, G ;
HERMANSSON, CG ;
HUGOSSON, J ;
PEDERSEN, KV .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 71 (04) :457-459
[2]  
BROOKS JD, 1998, CAMPBELLS UROLOGY, V1, P113
[3]  
Cookson MS, 2000, MOL UROL, V4, P93
[4]   PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A CLINICAL UROLOGICAL PRACTICE BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
COONER, WH ;
MOSLEY, BR ;
RUTHERFORD, CL ;
BEARD, JH ;
POND, HS ;
TERRY, WJ ;
IGEL, TC ;
KIDD, DD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (06) :1146-1154
[5]   MORBIDITY WITH CONTEMPORARY PROSTATE BIOPSY [J].
DESMOND, PM ;
CLARK, J ;
THOMPSON, IM ;
ZEIDMAN, EJ ;
MUELLER, EJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (05) :1425-1426
[6]   Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Eskew, LA ;
Bare, RL ;
McCullough, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :199-202
[7]   SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT BIOPSIES IN 651 PATIENTS REFERRED FOR PROSTATE EVALUATION [J].
HAMMERER, P ;
HULAND, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) :99-102
[8]   Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate [J].
Irani, J ;
Fournier, F ;
Bon, D ;
Gremmo, E ;
Dore, B ;
Aubert, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (04) :608-610
[9]   Cancer statistics, 1998 [J].
Landis, SH ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1998, 48 (01) :6-+
[10]   Prostate cancer: The role of transrectal ultrasound and its impact on cancer detection and management [J].
Littrup, PJ ;
Bailey, SE .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (01) :87-+