Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs

被引:46
|
作者
Littleton, Ashley C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Register-Mihalik, Johna K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guskiewicz, Kevin M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina, Human Movement Sci Curriculum, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, 209 Fetzer Hall CB 8700, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina, Matthew Gfeller Sport Related Traumat Brain Injur, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2015年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
concussion; psychometrics; cognition; computerized neurocognitive testing; Concussion Vital Signs; AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES; HIGH-SCHOOL; ONLINE VERSION; IMPACT; BATTERY; ASSESSMENTS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1177/1941738115586997
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background: Neurocognitive testing is an important concussion evaluation tool, but for neurocognitive tests to be useful, their psychometric properties must be well established. Test-retest reliability of computerized neurocognitive tests can influence their clinical utility. The reliability for a commonly used computerized neurocognitive test, CNS Vital Signs, is not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine test-retest reliability and reliable change indices for CNS Vital Signs in a healthy, physically active college population. Hypothesis: CNS Vital Signs yields acceptable test-retest reliability, with greater reliability between the second and third test administration compared with between the first and second administration. Study Design: Cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Forty healthy, active volunteers (16 men, 24 women; mean age, 21.05 +/- 2.17 years) reported to a clinical laboratory for 3 sessions, 1 week apart. At each session, participants were administered CNS Vital Signs. Outcomes included standard scores for the following CNS Vital Signs domains: verbal memory, visual memory, psychomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, complex attention, processing speed, reaction time, executive functioning, and reasoning. Results: Participants performed significantly better on the second session and/or third session than they did on the first testing session on 6 of 9 neurocognitive domains. Pearson r test-retest correlations between sessions ranged from 0.11 to 0.87. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.10 to 0.86. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider using reliable change indices to account for practice effects, identify meaningful score changes due to pathology, and inform clinical decisions. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights the importance of clinicians understanding the psychometric properties of computerized neurocognitive tests when using them in the management of sport-related concussion. If CNS Vital Signs is administered twice within a small time frame (such as 1 week), athletes should be expected to improve between the first and second administration.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 447
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Baseline Normative and Test-Retest Reliability Data for Sideline Concussion Assessment Measures in Youth
    Wethe, Jennifer V.
    Bogle, Jamie
    Dodick, David W.
    Howard, Marci D.
    Gould, Amanda Rach
    Butterfield, Richard J.
    Buras, Matthew R.
    Adler, Jennifer
    Talaber, Alexandra
    Soma, David
    Starling, Amaal J.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (15)
  • [22] Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes
    MacDonald, James
    Duerson, Drew
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2015, 25 (04): : 367 - 372
  • [23] Test-retest reliability of the standing heel-rise test
    Ross, MD
    Fontenot, EG
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2000, 9 (02) : 117 - 123
  • [24] Test-retest reliability of eye tracking measures in a Trail Test
    Recker, Lukas
    Poth, Christian H.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2023, 23 (08):
  • [25] Test-Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration
    Netzel, Lauren
    Moran, Ryan
    Hopfe, Dustin
    Salvatore, Anthony P.
    Brown, Warren
    Murray, Nicholas G.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 37 (02) : 449 - 456
  • [26] Test-retest reliability of an emotion maintenance task
    Broome, Rose
    Gard, David E.
    Mikels, Joseph A.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2012, 26 (04) : 737 - 747
  • [27] Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the test of nonverbal intelligence-fourth edition in patients with schizophrenia
    Chen, Kuan-Wei
    Lee, Ya-Chen
    Yu, Tzu-Ying
    Cheng, Li-Jung
    Chao, Chien-Yu
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [28] Test-Retest and Interrater Reliability of the Functional Lower Extremity Evaluation
    Haitz, Karyn
    Shultz, Rebecca
    Hodgins, Melissa
    Matheson, Gordon O.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (12) : 947 - 954
  • [29] Test-Retest Reliability and Reliable Change Estimates for Sensorimotor Concussion Assessments in Healthy Young Adults
    Edwards, Gregory C.
    Bruggeman, Alex E.
    Fogt, Nick
    Onate, James A.
    Bliss, Rebecca A.
    Quatman-Yates, Catherine C.
    Caccese, Jaclyn B.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [30] Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS)
    Merritt, Victoria C.
    Bradson, Megan L.
    Meyer, Jessica E.
    Arnett, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 40 (04) : 377 - 388