Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs

被引:46
|
作者
Littleton, Ashley C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Register-Mihalik, Johna K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guskiewicz, Kevin M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina, Human Movement Sci Curriculum, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, 209 Fetzer Hall CB 8700, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina, Matthew Gfeller Sport Related Traumat Brain Injur, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2015年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
concussion; psychometrics; cognition; computerized neurocognitive testing; Concussion Vital Signs; AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES; HIGH-SCHOOL; ONLINE VERSION; IMPACT; BATTERY; ASSESSMENTS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1177/1941738115586997
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background: Neurocognitive testing is an important concussion evaluation tool, but for neurocognitive tests to be useful, their psychometric properties must be well established. Test-retest reliability of computerized neurocognitive tests can influence their clinical utility. The reliability for a commonly used computerized neurocognitive test, CNS Vital Signs, is not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine test-retest reliability and reliable change indices for CNS Vital Signs in a healthy, physically active college population. Hypothesis: CNS Vital Signs yields acceptable test-retest reliability, with greater reliability between the second and third test administration compared with between the first and second administration. Study Design: Cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Forty healthy, active volunteers (16 men, 24 women; mean age, 21.05 +/- 2.17 years) reported to a clinical laboratory for 3 sessions, 1 week apart. At each session, participants were administered CNS Vital Signs. Outcomes included standard scores for the following CNS Vital Signs domains: verbal memory, visual memory, psychomotor speed, cognitive flexibility, complex attention, processing speed, reaction time, executive functioning, and reasoning. Results: Participants performed significantly better on the second session and/or third session than they did on the first testing session on 6 of 9 neurocognitive domains. Pearson r test-retest correlations between sessions ranged from 0.11 to 0.87. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.10 to 0.86. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider using reliable change indices to account for practice effects, identify meaningful score changes due to pathology, and inform clinical decisions. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights the importance of clinicians understanding the psychometric properties of computerized neurocognitive tests when using them in the management of sport-related concussion. If CNS Vital Signs is administered twice within a small time frame (such as 1 week), athletes should be expected to improve between the first and second administration.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 447
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery
    Nakayama, Yusuke
    Covassin, Tracey
    Schatz, Philip
    Nogle, Sally
    Kovan, Jeff
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (08) : 2000 - 2005
  • [2] Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs
    Broglio, Steven P.
    Ferrara, Michael S.
    Macciocchi, Stephen N.
    Baumgartner, Ted A.
    Elliott, Ronald
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2007, 42 (04) : 509 - 514
  • [3] The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion
    Resch, Jacob E.
    Schneider, Mathew W.
    Cullum, C. Munro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 132 : 31 - 38
  • [4] Test-Retest Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Testing in Youth Ice Hockey Players
    Womble, Melissa N.
    Reynolds, Erin
    Schatz, Philip
    Shah, Kishan M.
    Kontos, Anthony P.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 31 (04) : 305 - 312
  • [5] Test-Retest Reliability and Interpretation of Common Concussion Assessment Tools: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium
    Broglio, Steven P.
    Katz, Barry P.
    Zhao, Shi
    McCrea, Michael
    McAllister, Thomas
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (05) : 1255 - 1268
  • [6] Test-Retest, Interrater Reliability, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Dynamic Exertion Test (EXiT) for Concussion
    Sinnott, Aaron M.
    Eagle, Shawn R.
    Kochick, Victoria
    Collins, Michael W.
    Elbin, R. J.
    Connaboy, Christopher
    Kontos, Anthony P.
    Bricker, Indira R.
    Sparto, Patrick J.
    Flanagan, Shawn D.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (03): : 410 - 421
  • [7] Test-Retest Reliability and Efficacy of Individual Symptoms in Concussion Management
    Caccese, Jaclyn B.
    Garcia, Gian-Gabriel P.
    Kontos, Anthony P.
    Port, Nicholas
    Valerio, Kate
    Broglio, Steven P.
    McCrea, Michael
    McAllister, Thomas W.
    Pasquina, Paul F.
    Buckley, Thomas A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2023, 33 (01): : 52 - 60
  • [8] Test-Retest Reliability and the Effects of Exercise on the King-Devick Test
    Eddy, Ryan
    Goetschius, John
    Hertel, Jay
    Resch, Jacob
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2020, 30 (03): : 239 - 244
  • [9] One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery
    Schatz, Philip
    Ferris, Charles S.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (05) : 499 - 504
  • [10] Test-Retest Reliability and Responsiveness of the Computerized Adaptive Test of Social Functioning in Persons With Stroke
    Chiang, Hsin-yu
    Chen, Po-Ting
    Lee, Shih-Chieh
    Shieh, Yun-Jer
    Hsueh, I. -Ping
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 104 (09): : 1432 - 1438