Lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matching study

被引:37
|
作者
Lee, Joo Yong [1 ]
Diaz, Richilda Red [1 ]
Cho, Kang Su [1 ]
Yu, Ho Song [2 ]
Chung, Jae Seung [3 ]
Ham, Won Sik [1 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Urol Sci Inst, Severance Hosp,Dept Urol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Kwangju, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Pusan, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Clin Trial Ctr Med Devices, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Robot & Minimal Invas Surg Ctr, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
lymphocele; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; robotics; EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; NODE DISSECTION; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER CONTROL; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; METASTASIS;
D O I
10.1111/iju.12144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo investigate the incidence of lymphocele and determine the risk factors for postoperative lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by using propensity score-matching. MethodsA total of 483 patients underwent extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between January 2009 and August 2011. Of these, 200 patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography postoperatively to detect lymphocele after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Propensity scores for an established control group were calculated for each patient using multivariate logistic regression based on the following covariates: age, body mass index, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume calculated by transrectal ultrasound, biopsy Gleason sum and clinical tumor stage. ResultsLymphocele was identified in 41 patients (20.5%). There were no statistical differences in variables used in propensity score-matching. Operation time, estimated blood loss, catheterization and surgical margin positivity did not show differences between the two groups. Seminal vesicle invasion (P=0.015) and tumor volume (P=0.042) between the two groups were significantly different. In the multivariate logistic regression model, extracapsular extension (P=0.017, odds ratio 4.231), seminal vesicle invasion (P=0.028, odds ratio 2.643) and the number of positive lymph nodes (P=0.041, odds ratio 3.532) were independent risk factors for lymphocele development after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. ConclusionsLymphocele might preferentially develop in cases with seminal vesicle invasion and large tumor volume. Additionally, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and the number of positive lymph nodes are independent risk factors for postoperative lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1176
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy, Single Site Plus Two Model
    Lo, Ing-Shiang
    Lee, Hsiang-Ying
    Chou, Yii-her
    Huang, Chun-Nung
    Wu, Wen-Jeng
    Yeh, Hsin-Chih
    Yang, Kai Fu
    Lee, Cheng Hsueh
    Li, Ching-Chia
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (02): : 140 - 144
  • [42] Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Control and Survival after Robot-Assisted versus Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    O'Malley, Padraic
    Chughtai, Bilal
    Isaacs, Abby
    Mao, Jialin
    Wright, Jason D.
    Hershman, Dawn
    Sedrakyan, Art
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 115 - 121
  • [43] The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Xiao-Lu Jiang
    Kui OuYang
    Rui Yang
    Jia-Ning Sun
    Feng Zhang
    Hong-Wei Zhao
    BMC Urology, 23
  • [44] Faster both in operative time and functional recovery by the extraperitoneal daVinci SP-based robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis compared to transperitoneal multiport counterpart
    Ko, Young Hwii
    Jang, Jae Youn
    Kim, Yeong Uk
    Kim, Sang Won
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [45] Effects of Previous Hernia Repair on Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched-Pair Analysis Study
    AL-Shareef, Ahmed H.
    Akin, Yigit
    Almouhissen, Turky
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Alshehri, Mohammed Saad
    Goezen, Ali Serdar
    Teber, Dogu
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (10) : 1143 - 1147
  • [46] Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Mottrie, Alexander
    Gallina, Andrea
    De Wil, Peter
    Thueer, David
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (6B) : 999 - 1006
  • [47] Predischarge Predictors of Readmissions and Postdischarge Complications in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Xia, Leilei
    Taylor, Benjamin L.
    Pulido, Jose E.
    Mucksavage, Phillip
    Lee, David I.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) : 864 - 871
  • [48] Conservative management of urinary incontinence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Marchioni, Michele
    Primiceri, Giulia
    Castellan, Pietro
    Schips, Luigi
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Chapple, Christopher
    Papalia, Rocco
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Scarpa, Roberto Mario
    Esperto, Francesco
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (05) : 555 - 562
  • [49] Stapling for prostate pedicle management during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Wit, Esther M. K.
    De Jong, Jeroen
    Acar, Cenk
    Van Muilekom, Erik
    Tillier, Corinne
    De Blok, Willem
    Van Der Poel, Henk
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2016, 68 (05) : 429 - 436
  • [50] Feasibility of interaortocaval clamping for renal artery during robot-assisted right partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matching analysis
    Motoyama, Daisuke
    Kawakami, Asuka
    Sato, Ryo
    Watanabe, Kyohei
    Matsushita, Yuto
    Watanabe, Hiromitsu
    Ito, Toshiki
    Sugiyama, Takayuki
    Otsuka, Atsushi
    Miyake, Hideaki
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (03) : 531 - 538