Relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot-ankle alignment in patients with metatarsal head pain: a cross-sectional study

被引:3
作者
Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel [1 ]
Velasco-Ramos, Esther [3 ]
Ruiz Munoz, Maria [2 ]
Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Inst Invest Biomed Malaga IBIMA, Dept Fis, Grp Clinimetria FE 14, Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, Inst Invest Biomed Malaga IBIMA, Dept Enfermer & Podol, Grp Clinimetria FE 14, Malaga, Spain
[3] Univ Malaga, Fac Ciencias Salud, Malaga, Spain
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Clin Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Metatarsalgia; Outcome assessment; Quality of life; Measurement; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; 1ST METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT; CULTURAL ADAPTATION; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; INTERRATER; INTRARATER; PEOPLE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-016-0182-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of the present study is to establish the relationship between foot-ankle patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot-ankle alignment (MoFAA) in patients with metatarsal head pain. Methods: A cross-sectional study where 206 patients completed three PROMs and a clinician recorded three MoFAA bilaterally (three times each). A reliability analysis of the MoFAA, a correlation analysis (between MoFAA and PROM) and regression analysis (dependent variable: PROM; independent variables: MoFAA) were performed. Results: Pearson's coefficient changed in each PROM used, ranging from 0.243 (AAOS-FAM(ShoeComfortScale)-FVA(Right)) to 0.807 (FFIIndex-first MTPJE(right)). Regression indices (R-2-corrected) ranged between 0.117 (AAOS-FAM(ShoeComfortScale)) and 0.701 (FFIIndex). Conclusions: The MoFAA correlated between moderately to strongly with the foot-ankle PROM selected. The level of correlation between MoFAA and PROM was higher when patients with metatarsal head pain were asked about foot health status, pain and function; however, the correlation was poor when the patient was asked about shoe aspects. In addition, the MoFAA variable that achieved the highest correlation value was the first metatarsophalangeal joint extension. The results obtained in this study could be used in future studies to develop tools for assessing and monitoring patients with metatarsal head pain.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot–ankle alignment in patients with metatarsal head pain: a cross-sectional study
    Manuel González-Sánchez
    Esther Velasco-Ramos
    Maria Ruiz Muñoz
    Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 9
  • [2] Assessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures
    Ponkilainen, Ville T.
    Tukiainen, Erkki J.
    Uimonen, Mikko M.
    Hakkinen, Arja H.
    Repo, Jussi P.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (02) : 169 - 174
  • [3] Use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in renal units in Australia and New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey study
    Morton, Rachael L.
    Lioufas, Nicole
    Dansie, Kathryn
    Palmer, Suetonia C.
    Jose, Matthew D.
    Raj, Rajesh
    Salmon, Andrew
    Sypek, Matthew
    Tong, Allison
    Ludlow, Marie
    Boudville, Neil
    McDonald, Stephen
    NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 25 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [4] Patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis patients: results of the first multicenter cross-sectional ePROMs study in France
    Abdallah Guerraoui
    Mathilde Prezelin-Reydit
    Anne Kolko
    Marie Lino-Daniel
    Charlotte Dumas de Roque
    Pablo Urena
    Philippe Chauveau
    Catherine Lasseur
    Julie Haesebaert
    Agnes Caillette-Beaudoin
    BMC Nephrology, 22
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis patients: results of the first multicenter cross-sectional ePROMs study in France
    Guerraoui, Abdallah
    Prezelin-Reydit, Mathilde
    Kolko, Anne
    Lino-Daniel, Marie
    de Roque, Charlotte Dumas
    Urena, Pablo
    Chauveau, Philippe
    Lasseur, Catherine
    Haesebaert, Julie
    Caillette-Beaudoin, Agnes
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [6] Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons
    Zwiers, R.
    Weel, H.
    Mallee, W. H.
    Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J.
    van Dijk, C. N.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (03) : 246 - 251
  • [7] A qualitative study to identify thematic areas for HIV related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM)
    Lohiniva, Anna-Leena
    Isosomppi, Sanna
    Pasanen, Sini
    Sutinen, Jussi
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures for the evaluation of foot and ankle function-recommendations from the research committee of the AGA
    Ackermann, Jakob
    Guenther, Daniel
    Laky, Brenda
    Mathis, Dominic
    Deichsel, Adrian
    Akguen, Doruk
    Schuettler, Karl Friedrich
    Wafaisade, Arasch
    Eggeling, Lena
    Kopf, Sebastian
    Herbst, Elmar
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2023, 36 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [9] Evaluation of Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of 3 Patient-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Measures
    Venkatesan, Murali
    Aziz, Sheweidin
    Mahadevan, Dev
    Korim, Tawfiq
    Dias, Joe
    Bhatia, Maneesh
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 59 (03) : 507 - 512
  • [10] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Foot and Ankle Pathologies: A Systematic Review
    Belen Ortega-Avila, Ana
    Cervera-Garvi, Pablo
    Ramos-Petersen, Laura
    Chicharro-Luna, Esther
    Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (02):