Comparative analysis of thermal preference prediction performance in different conditions using ensemble learning models based on ASHRAE Comfort Database II

被引:16
作者
Bai, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Kai [1 ]
Wang, Yuying [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Informat & Control Engn, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Sci, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Anhui Prov Key Lab Intelligent Bldg & Bldg Energy, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China
[4] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Informat & Control Engn, 13 Yanta Rd, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Thermal preference prediction; Ensemble learning models; Season; Building type; Deep cascade forest; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT QUALITY; RANDOM FOREST; BUILDINGS; OCCUPANTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109462
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Prediction of thermal comfort of building occupants using ensemble learning models is a hot research topic. The performance of ensemble learning models used to predict thermal preference may not only be determined by its algorithm structure, but also by the parameters of the data set chosen for training the learning models as well as the characteristics (building type and season) of the dataset. In this paper, based on precision, recall, F1-score, weighted F1-score, the prediction performance of 10 machine learning models (6 traditional and 4 ensemble models) trained with different data subsets was compared systematically, and the characteristics of ASHRAE Comfort Database II were used for the first time to observe the performance of ensemble learning models. The feature importance of the variables was calculated by random forest (RF) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) to explore the key parameters influencing thermal preference prediction. The results showed that the performance of the ensemble models achieved the greatest improvement in the process of training data increasing from 40% to 60%. After training with the data from the classroom during the summer, the ensemble learning models showed a significant performance based on the weighted F1-score. Furthermore, compared with other models, RF and deep cascade forest (DCF) showed significant advantages in predicting thermal preference with different data subsets. Therefore, RF and DCF with selected key parameters of thermal preference can be used to predict individual thermal preference in different conditions, providing references for automatic regu-lation of building thermal environments.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   An intelligent healthcare monitoring framework using wearable sensors and social networking data [J].
Ali, Farman ;
El-Sappagh, Shaker ;
Islam, S. M. Riazul ;
Ali, Amjad ;
Attique, Muhammad ;
Imran, Muhammad ;
Kwak, Kyung-Sup .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2021, 114 :23-43
[2]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[3]   A Comprehensive Review on Medical Diagnosis Using Machine Learning [J].
Bhavsar, Kaustubh Arun ;
Abugabah, Ahed ;
Singla, Jimmy ;
AlZubi, Ahmad Ali ;
Bashir, Ali Kashif ;
Nikita .
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 67 (02) :1997-2014
[4]   Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics [J].
Boulesteix, Anne-Laure ;
Janitza, Silke ;
Kruppa, Jochen ;
Koenig, Inke R. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2012, 2 (06) :493-507
[5]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[6]   Machine learning driven personal comfort prediction by wearable sensing of pulse rate and skin temperature [J].
Chaudhuri, Tanaya ;
Soh, Yeng Chai ;
Li, Hua ;
Xie, Lihua .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 170
[7]  
Chen T., 2015, R PACKAGE VERSION 04, V1, P1
[8]   Analysis of the accuracy on PMV - PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II [J].
Cheung, Toby ;
Schiavon, Stefano ;
Parkinson, Thomas ;
Li, Peixian ;
Brager, Gail .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 153 :205-217
[9]   Machine learning method for real-time non-invasive prediction of individual thermal preference in transient conditions [J].
Cosma, Andrei Claudiu ;
Simha, Rahul .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 148 :372-383
[10]   An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization [J].
Dietterich, TG .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2000, 40 (02) :139-157