Factors influencing intensive care admission: a mixed methods study of EM and ICU

被引:14
作者
Emerson, Philip [1 ]
Brooks, Daniel [1 ]
Quasim, Tara [1 ,2 ]
Puxty, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Kinsella, John [1 ,2 ]
Lowe, David J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Med, Acad Unit Anaesthesia Pain & Crit Care Med, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Royal Infirm, Intens Care Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Royal Infirm, Emergency Dept, Castle St, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
emergency department; intensive care; mixed methods; referrals; shared mental model; DECISIONS; MORTALITY; COHORT; UNITS;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000300
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives Twenty-six percent of ICU patients in the UK are referred directly from the Emergency Department (ED). There is limited literature examining the attitudes or practice of ED/ICU physicians towards referrals from the ED to the ICU. We examined these attitudes through a mixed methods study, designing a model incorporating these attitudes to promote a shared mental model between ED and ICU specialities. Methods Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 ED consultants and 11 ICU consultants at two hospitals in the west of Scotland. Interviews were based on 10 'case-based vignettes' representing patients for whom referral from the ED to the ICU is borderline or challenging. Participants were asked to note whether they would refer/accept the patient from the ED to the ICU. The proportions of participants from each speciality choosing to refer or accept patients were compared using a t-test comparing proportions. The reasons behind these decisions were explored during the semistructured interviews. Results Twelve factors emerged as influencing the decisions made by the participants. These belonged three core themes: patient factors, clinician factors and resource factors, which were incorporated into a shared mental model. Two cases demonstrated statistically significant differences in referral rates between specialities. There were also clinically significant differences among other cases. Conclusion We have described the attitudes of physicians towards ED to ICU referrals in two west of Scotland hospitals, and we have demonstrated that there is a difference in the aspects of the decision-making process. We have developed a model encompassing all factors considered by participants when assessing these difficult referrals. It is hoped that this model will promote shared and more efficient decision-making in the future. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 24:29-35 Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Brannen J., 2006, QUAL RES, V6, P97
  • [2] Croskerry P, 2001, CJEM, V3, P271
  • [3] Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: a cohort study
    Cuthbertson, Brian H.
    Roughton, Sian
    Jenkinson, David
    MacLennan, Graeme
    Vale, Luke
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (01):
  • [4] Egol A, 1999, CRIT CARE MED, V27, P633
  • [5] Considering age when making treatment decisions in the ICU: too little, too much, or just right?
    Ehlenbach, William J.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (05):
  • [6] Fullerton JN, 2011, CLIN MED, V11, P601
  • [7] Triaging patients to the ICU: a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes
    Garrouste-Orgeas, M
    Montuclard, L
    Timsit, JF
    Misset, B
    Christias, M
    Carlet, J
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (05) : 774 - 781
  • [8] Quality of life before intensive care unit admission is a predictor of survival
    Hofhuis, Jose Gm
    Spronk, Peter E.
    Van Stel, Henk F.
    Schrijvers, Augustinus Jp
    Bakker, Jan
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 11 (04):
  • [9] Reasons for refusal of admission to intensive care and impact on mortality
    Iapichino, Gaetano
    Corbella, Davide
    Minelli, Cosetta
    Mills, Gary H.
    Artigas, Antonio
    Edbooke, David L.
    Pezzi, Angelo
    Kesecioglu, Jozef
    Patroniti, Nicol
    Baras, Mario
    Sprung, Charles L.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (10) : 1772 - 1779
  • [10] Intensive Care Society, 2009, Intensive Care Soc Joint descriptive document