Speech Performance after Anterolateral Thigh Phonatory Tube Reconstruction for Total Laryngectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Lu, Yi-An [1 ]
Pei, Yu-Cheng [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chuang, Hsiu-Feng [1 ]
Lin, Li-Yun [1 ]
Hsin, Li-Jen [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Chung-Jan [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Shiang-Fu [1 ,2 ]
Chiang, Hui-Chen [6 ]
Tsao, Chung-Kan [2 ,7 ]
Fang, Tuan-Jen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Ctr Vascularized Tissue Allograft, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Hlth Aging Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Ming Chuan Univ, Grad Sch Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Laryngeal cancer; total laryngectomy; speech; ALT flap; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VOICE HANDICAP INDEX; VOCAL REHABILITATION; FREE-FLAP; PHARYNGOESOPHAGEAL RECONSTRUCTION; LOW-RESISTANCE; PROSTHESIS; INTELLIGIBILITY; RESTORATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/lary.29005
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective Traditionally, after total laryngopharyngectomy (TLP), patients cannot speak without a prosthesis or an artificial larynx. In Taiwan, most patients use a commercialized pneumatic laryngeal device (PLD). Phonatory tube reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a novel, modified version of synchronous digestive and phonatory reconstruction involving a free muscular cutaneous flap. This study reviewed and compared speech performance between patients who underwent novel flap reconstruction and conventional PLD users. Method We retrospectively reviewed patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent TLP from August 2017 to September 2019. The voice handicap index (VHI), speech intelligibility, acoustic and aerodynamic analysis results, and speech range profile (SRP) were compared between patients who underwent ALT phonatory tube reconstruction (ALT group) and those using PLDs (PLD group). Results Twenty patients were included; 13 patients were included in the ALT group, and 7 patients were included in the PLD group. Compared to the PLD group, the ALT group had a better fundamental frequency range (P< .001) and semitone range (P< .001) during speech but showed worse jitter, shimmer, and harmonic-to-noise ratios. The two groups showed comparable VHI and speech intelligibility performance. Conclusions The ALT phonatory tube, a novel flap for reconstruction, can restore digestive and voice functions simultaneously. Compared with PLD use, ALT phonatory tube reconstruction yields an improved speech range and comparable levels of voice handicap and speech intelligibility, suggesting that the technique is a good alternative for patients after TLP. Level of Evidence 4Laryngoscope, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1357
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia after total laryngectomy with or without pharyngoesophageal reconstruction: Systematic review
    Terlingen, Lisanne T.
    Pilz, Walmari
    Kuijer, Myrthe
    Kremer, Bernd
    Baijens, Laura W.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (12): : 2733 - 2748
  • [32] Speech Intelligibility and Marital Quality in Couples after Total Laryngectomy - Partners' View
    Steckel, Isabelle
    Singer, Susanne
    Keszte, Judith
    Pabst, Friedemann
    Meyer, Alexandra
    PSYCHOTHERAPIE PSYCHOSOMATIK MEDIZINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2019, 69 (02) : 63 - 71
  • [33] Voice Onset Time in Patients Using Speech Prosthesis After Total Laryngectomy
    Azizli, Elad
    Alkan, Zeynep
    Kocak, Ismail
    Yigit, Ozgur
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2022, 36 (06) : 879.e1 - 879.e4
  • [34] Hypopharyngeal reconstruction with an anterolateral thigh flap after laryngopharyngeal resection: Results of a retrospective study on 20 patients
    Sagar, Belsam
    Marres, Henri A. M.
    Hartman, Ed H. M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (06) : 970 - 975
  • [35] One versus Two Venous Anastomoses in Anterolateral Thigh Flap Reconstruction after Oral Cancer Ablation
    Lee, Yao-Chou
    Chen, Wei-Chen
    Chen, Szu-Han
    Hung, Kuo-Shu
    Hsiao, Jenn-Ren
    Lee, Jing-Wei
    Shieh, Shyh-Jou
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (02) : 481 - 489
  • [36] Quality of life of patients after total laryngectomy: the struggle against stigmatization and social exclusion using speech synthesis
    Mertl, Jiri
    Zackova, Eva
    Repova, Barbora
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 13 (04) : 342 - 352
  • [37] Speech restoration with tracheoesophageal prosthesis after total laryngectomy: An observational study of vocal results, complications and quality of life
    Apert, V.
    Carsuzaa, F.
    Tonnerre, D.
    Leclerc, J.
    Lebreton, J. -P.
    Delagranda, A.
    Dufour, X.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2022, 139 (02) : 73 - 76
  • [38] Comparison of Voice Handicap Index in Patients with Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Speech after Total Laryngectomy
    Dragicevic, Danijela
    Jovic, Rajko M.
    Kljajic, Vladimir
    Vlaski, Ljiljana
    Savovic, Slobodan
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2020, 72 (05) : 363 - 369
  • [39] Chimeric anterolateral thigh free flap for reconstruction of complex cranio-orbito-facial defects after skull base cancers resection
    Cherubino, Mario
    Turri-Zanoni, Mario
    Battaglia, Paolo
    Giudice, Marco
    Pellegatta, Igor
    Tamborini, Federico
    Maggiulli, Francesca
    Guzzetti, Luca
    Di Giovanna, Danilo
    Bignami, Maurizio
    Calati, Carolina
    Castelnuovo, Paolo
    Valdatta, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [40] Functional tongue reconstruction after compartmental surgery: a schematic model for planning and insetting of the anterolateral thigh free flap
    Gazzini, Luca
    Dallari, Virginia
    Fazio, Enrico
    Abousiam, Monir
    Nebiaj, Aurel
    Caselli, Arianna
    Accorona, Remo
    Calabrese, Luca
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 282 (03) : 1411 - 1419