In vivo biometry and carcass characteristics of lambs in different finishing systems

被引:1
作者
da Motte, Juliano Henriques [1 ]
Pires, Cleber Cassol [2 ]
Osorio Dias, Ana Maria [3 ]
Manzoni, Veronica Gindri [3 ]
Martins, Andressa Ana [4 ]
Borges, Luiza Ilha [5 ]
Teixeira, William Soares [3 ]
Batista, Natalie Viero [6 ]
Carvalho, Gabriela [6 ]
Rosati, Juliene da Silva [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Dept Zootecnia, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Santa Catarina, UDESC, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Chapeco, SC, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Zootecnia, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
来源
SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS | 2019年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词
Tissue composition; Body measurement; Sheep; COMPONENTS; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n2p855
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of different finishing systems on the in vivo measurements, quantitative and qualitative carcass characteristics, commercial cut ratio, and shoulder tissue composition of lambs. Thirty-two male lambs were distributed in four finishing systems with eight replications each, as follows: suckling lambs on pasture; suckling lambs in confinement, with access to creep-feeding containing corn bran and soybean meal; weaned lambs fed roughage, characterized by ad libitum supply of alfalfa hay; and weaned lambs fed concentrate, composed of oat grain and soybean meal. The lambs were slaughtered as they reached the pre-set live weight at slaughtering of 30 kg. Most of the in vivo biometry variables were not significant (P > 0.05) when comparing the finishing systems, except for hindlimb height and thoracic perimeter. Regarding the quantitative carcass characteristics, all variables differed (P < 0.05) between systems, except for carcass length, leg width, and subcutaneous fat thickness. For the qualitative carcass characteristics, only the fatness and carcass conformation presented significant differences (P < 0.05). Most in vivo measurements and the proportion of carcass cuts were not influenced by finishing systems. Weaned lambs fed an exclusive concentrate diet presented leaner carcasses with an inferior conformation when compared to the other finishing systems. Suckling lambs in confinement presented shoulders with a higher fat deposition when compared to those weaned. Suckling lambs both on pasture and in confinement presented a superiority in the quantitative carcass characteristics when compared to weaned lambs.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 866
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Carcass characteristics, non-carcass components and morphometry in sheep submitted to different supplementation strategies
    Alves, Dorismar David
    de Araujo, Luciano Macena
    de Freitas Monteiro, Helida Christhine
    Leonel, Fernando de Paula
    Vieira e Silva, Fredson
    Simoes, Danilo Antunes
    Goncalves, Weiber da Costa
    Santos Brant, Lara Maria
    [J]. SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2013, 34 (06): : 3093 - 3104
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1961, CLIMA RIO GRANDE SUL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, Metodos para avaliacao da producao de carne ovina: in vivo, na carcaca e na carne
  • [4] BOCCARD R., 1960, ANN INST NATL RECH AGRON SER D ANN ZOOTECH, V9, P355, DOI 10.1051/animres:19600405
  • [5] Performance from birth to weaning of Santa Ines lambs born to ewes fed different levels of energy
    Boscaro de Castro, Filipe Alexandre
    de Azambuja Ribeiro, Edson Luis
    Koritiaki, Natalia Albieri
    Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika
    Ferreira da Silva, Leandro das Dores
    Pereira, Elzania Sales
    Pinto, Andrea Pereira
    Constantino, Camila
    Fernandes Junior, Francisco
    [J]. SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2012, 33 : 3379 - 3388
  • [6] Wet brewery residue in the finishing of feedlot lambs and its effects on the carcass characteristics and non-carcass components
    Carvalho, S.
    Frasson, M. F.
    Simoes, F. S. B.
    Bernardes, G. M. C.
    Simoes, R. R.
    Griebler, L.
    Pellegrin, A. C. R. S.
    Menegon, A. M.
    Deponti, L. S.
    Severo, M. M.
    Mello, V. L.
    [J]. ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2017, 69 (03) : 742 - 750
  • [7] Carvalho Sérgio, 2007, Cienc. Rural, V37, P821, DOI 10.1590/S0103-84782007000300034
  • [8] Colomer-Rocher F., 1988, Cuadernos INIA, V17, P19
  • [9] Meat sheep production on four different production systems
    Espirito Candal Poli, Cesar Henrique
    Gomes Monteiro, Alda Lucia
    de Barros, Carina Simionato
    de Moraes, Anibal
    Machado Fernandes, Maria Angela
    Piazzetta, Hugo von Linsingen
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 37 (04): : 666 - 673
  • [10] Grandis Fernando Augusto, 2016, Ciênc. anim. bras., V17, P327, DOI 10.1590/1089-6891v17i330941