Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

被引:58
作者
Kamdar, Forum [1 ]
John, Ranjit [2 ]
Eckman, Peter [1 ]
Colvin-Adams, Monica [1 ]
Shumway, Sara J. [2 ]
Liao, Kenneth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Med Ctr, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; HEART; BRIDGE; OUTCOMES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have become the standard of care for patients with heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplant. However, data on long-term post-transplant survival for these patients are limited. We evaluated the effect of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on postcardiac transplant survival in the current era. Methods: All patients who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant at a single center from June 2005 to September 2011 were evaluated. Results: Of the 167 patients who received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant, 77 (46%) underwent cardiac transplantation, 27 died before transplantation (16%), and 63 (38%) remain listed for transplantation and continued with left ventricular assist device support. The mean age of the transplanted patients was 54.5 +/- 11.9 years, 57% had an ischemic etiology, and 20% were women. The overall mean duration of left ventricular assist device support before transplantation was 310 +/- 227 days (range, 67-1230 days). The mean duration of left ventricular assist device support did not change in patients who had received a left ventricular assist device in the early period of the study (2005-2008, n = 62) compared with those who had received a left ventricular assist device later (2009-2011, n = 78, 373 vs 392 days, P = NS). In addition, no difference was seen in survival between those patients supported with a left ventricular assist device for fewer than 180 days or longer than 180 days before transplantation (P = NS). The actuarial survival after transplantation at 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 98.7%, 93.0%, 91.1%, and 88.0%, respectively. Conclusions: The short- and long-term post-transplant survival for patients bridged with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in the current era has been excellent. Furthermore, the duration of left ventricular assist device support did not affect post-transplant survival. The hemodynamic benefits of ventricular unloading with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices, in addition to their durability and reduced patient morbidity, have contributed to improved post-transplant survival. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:575-81)
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Use of an Intrapericardial, Continuous-Flow, Centrifugal Pump in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation [J].
Aaronson, Keith D. ;
Slaughter, Mark S. ;
Miller, Leslie W. ;
McGee, Edwin C. ;
Cotts, William G. ;
Acker, Michael A. ;
Jessup, Mariell L. ;
Gregoric, Igor D. ;
Loyalka, Pranav ;
Frazier, O. H. ;
Jeevanandam, Valluvan ;
Anderson, Allen S. ;
Kormos, Robert L. ;
Teuteberg, Jeffrey J. ;
Levy, Wayne C. ;
Naftel, David C. ;
Bittman, Richard M. ;
Pagani, Francis D. ;
Hathaway, David R. ;
Boyce, Steven W. .
CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (25) :3191-+
[2]   Left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation does not adversely affect one-year heart transplantation survival [J].
Cleveland, Joseph C., Jr. ;
Grover, Frederick L. ;
Fullerton, David A. ;
Campbell, David N. ;
Mitchell, Max B. ;
Lindenfeld, JoAnn ;
Wolfel, Eugene E. ;
Lowes, Brian D. ;
Shakar, Simon F. ;
Brieke, Andreas ;
Cannon, Anne ;
Robertson, Alastair D. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 136 (03) :774-777
[3]   Transplant Registrants With Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Devices Have Insufficient Risk to Justify Elective Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Status 1A Time [J].
Dardas, Todd ;
Mokadam, Nahush A. ;
Pagani, Francis ;
Aaronson, Keith ;
Levy, Wayne C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (01) :36-43
[4]   Left ventricular assist device performance with long-term circulatory support: Lessons from the REMATCH trial [J].
Dembitsky, WP ;
Tector, AJ ;
Park, S ;
Moskowitz, AJ ;
Gelijns, AC ;
Ronan, NS ;
Piccione, W ;
Holman, WL ;
Furukawa, S ;
Frazier, OH ;
Weinberg, AD ;
Heatley, G ;
Poirier, VL ;
Damme, L ;
Long, JW .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 78 (06) :2123-2129
[5]   A prospective, multicenter trial of the VentrAssist left ventricular assist device for bridge to transplant: Safety and efficacy [J].
Esmore, Donald ;
Kaye, David ;
Spratt, Phillip ;
Larbalestier, Robert ;
Ruygrok, Peter ;
Tsui, Steven ;
Meyers, Deborah ;
Fiane, Arnt E. ;
Woodard, John .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 27 (06) :579-588
[6]   Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the Thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation [J].
Farrar, DJ ;
Hill, JD ;
Pennington, DG ;
McBride, LR ;
Holman, WL ;
Kormos, RL ;
Esmore, D ;
Gray, LA ;
Seifert, PE ;
Schoettle, GP ;
Moore, CH ;
Hendry, PJ ;
Bhayana, JN .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (01) :202-209
[7]   Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation [J].
Frazier, OH ;
Rose, EA ;
Oz, MC ;
Dembitsky, W ;
McCarthy, P ;
Radovancevic, B ;
Poirier, VL ;
Dasse, KA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 122 (06) :1186-1195
[8]   IMPROVED MORTALITY AND REHABILITATION OF TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES TREATED WITH A LONG-TERM IMPLANTABLE LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST SYSTEM [J].
FRAZIER, OH ;
ROSE, EA ;
MCCARTHY, P ;
BURTON, NA ;
TECTOR, A ;
LEVIN, H ;
KAYNE, HL ;
POIRIER, VL ;
DASSE, KA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (03) :327-338
[9]   Lessons Learned From Experience With Over 100 Consecutive HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices [J].
John, Ranjit ;
Kamdar, Forum ;
Eckman, Peter ;
Colvin-Adams, Monica ;
Boyle, Andrew ;
Shumway, Sara ;
Joyce, Lyle ;
Liao, Kenneth .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (05) :1593-1600
[10]   Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes in Commercial Use Compared With the Prior Clinical Trial [J].
John, Ranjit ;
Naka, Yoshifumi ;
Smedira, Nicholas G. ;
Starling, Randall ;
Jorde, Ulrich ;
Eckman, Peter ;
Farrar, David J. ;
Pagani, Francis D. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (04) :1406-1412