Bioequivalence study of two different film-coated tablet formulations of losart-an-hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers

被引:2
|
作者
Neves, Rita [1 ]
Almedia, Susana [1 ,2 ]
Filipe, Augusto [1 ]
Franco Spinola, Ana Cristina [1 ]
Abolfathi, Zohreh [3 ]
Yritia, Mercedes [4 ]
Ortuno, Jordi [4 ]
机构
[1] Tecnimede SA, Dept Med, Grp Tecnimede, P-2685338 Prior Velho, Portugal
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Anapharm, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Anapharm Europe, Barcelona, Spain
来源
ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH | 2008年 / 58卷 / 08期
关键词
antihypertensive drugs; CAS; 58-93-5; 124750-99-8; hydrochlorothiazide; bioequivalence; losartan;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The study was conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of two film-coated formulations containing 100 mg of losartan (CAS 124750-99-8) and 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide (CAS58-93-5). Seventy-three healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomised, single-dose, open-label, two-way crossover study, with a minimum washout period (of 7 days. A total of 21 blood samples were collected up to 36 h post-dosing. Losartan, losartan carboxy acid and hydrochlorothiazide levels were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass detection (lower limit of quantification: 1.01 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide, 2.02 ng/mL for losartan and 2.51 ng/mL for losartan carboxy acid). Pharmacokinetic parameters used for bioequivalence assessment (AUC(0-t) and C-max as primary and AUC(0-Inf) as secondary pharmacokinetic parameters) were determined from the losartan and hydrochlorothiazide concentration data using non-compartmental analysis. Data from losartan carboxy acid was reported and presented as supportive data. The 90 % confidence intervals (obtained by ANOVA) for losartan were 97.05-118.48 % for C-max, 100.76-106. 10 % for AUC(0-t) and 100.80-106.10 % for AUC(0-inf) whereas for hydrochlorothiazide the 90 % confidence intervals obtained were 103.94-115.33 % for C-max, 101.97-109.61 % for AUC(0-t) and 101.77-109.02 % for AUC(0-inf), and for losartan carboxy acid the intervals obtained were 98.31-107.82 % for C-max, 97.89-104.30 % for AUC(0-t) and 98.06-104.30 % for AUC(0-inf). All the 90 % confidence intervals obtained for all the parameters assessed were within the predefined ranges (80-125%). Based on these results, it can be concluded that the evaluated formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 375
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bioequivalence Study of Two Fixed Dose Combination Tablet Formulations of Lopinavir and Ritonavir in Healthy Volunteers
    Chachad, Siddarth
    Lulla, Amar
    Malhotra, Geena
    Purandare, Shrinivas
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (05): : 263 - 268
  • [22] Bioequivalence study of two mirtazapine oral tablet formulations in healthy Chinese male volunteers
    Zheng, Li
    Yu, Qin
    Miao, Jia
    Xiang, Jin
    Xu, Nan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 50 (05) : 368 - 374
  • [23] Bioequivalence evaluation of two strengths of risperidone tablet formulations in healthy volunteers
    Canovas, M.
    Delgadillo, J.
    Torres, F.
    Riba, N.
    Cebrecos, J.
    Pelagio, P.
    Cabre, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 47 (02) : 124 - 131
  • [24] Bioequivalence study of two esomeprazole enteric coated formulations in healthy Chinese volunteers
    Cai, Wei
    Wang, Zheng-ting
    Li, Juan
    Hu, Jia-jia
    Zhong, Jie
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (09): : 502 - 505
  • [25] Comparative study on the bioequivalence of two formulations of pioglitazone tablet in healthy Thai male volunteers
    Sripalakit, Pattana
    Maphanta, Sirada
    Neamhom, Penporn
    Saraphanchotiwitthaya, Aurasorn
    Polnok, Sanglar
    Yokubol, Dhirayudh
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2007, 33 (12) : 1362 - 1368
  • [26] Bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of cefadroxil in healthy volunteers
    Kano, Eunice Kazue
    Porta, Valentina
    Koono, Eunice Emiko Mori
    Schramm, Simone Grigoleto
    Serra, Cristina Helena dos Reis
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (01): : 42 - 47
  • [27] Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers
    Allegrini, Alessandro
    Nuzzo, Loredana
    Scaringi, Andrea Tavella
    Felaco, Stefano
    Pavone, Daniele
    Toniato, Elena
    Mezzetti, Andrea
    Martinotti, Stefano
    Lenotti, Giuseppina
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (08): : 385 - 388
  • [28] Bioequivalence of two lithium formulations in healthy volunteers
    Guilherme, Marcia Cristina
    Pereira, Darcio Gomes
    Galuppo, Miriam Prado
    Mendes, Gustavo D.
    Donato, Jose Luiz
    De Nucci, Gilberto
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2006, 56 (07): : 524 - 528
  • [29] Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of atenolol after single oral administration in healthy volunteers
    Niopas, I
    Daftsios, AC
    Xanthakis, I
    Nikolaidis, N
    Njau, SN
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2000, 50 (03): : E243 - E247
  • [30] Bioequivalence Study of Two Minocycline Capsule Formulations in Healthy Volunteers
    Setiawati, Effi
    Purnonno, Asri
    Deniati, Siti Hawa
    Yunaidi, Danang Agung
    Handayani, Lucia Rat
    Harinato, Gunawan
    Santoso, Iwan Dwi
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (10): : 532 - 536