Levels and major sources of PM2.5 and PM10 in Bangkok Metropolitan Region

被引:76
作者
Chuersuwan, Nares [1 ]
Nimrat, Subuntith [2 ]
Lekphet, Sukanda [3 ]
Kerdkumrai, Tida [4 ]
机构
[1] Suranaree Univ Technol, Inst Med, Sch Environm Hlth, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
[2] Burapha Univ, Fac Sci, Chon Buri, Thailand
[3] Dept Water Resources, Buraeu Res Dev & Hydrol, Bangkok, Thailand
[4] Dept Sci Serv, Phys & Engn Program, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
PM10; PM2.5; Bangkok; air quality; source contributions;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research was the first long-term attempt to concurrently measure and identify major sources of both PM10 and PM2.5 in Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR). Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 were evaluated at four monitoring stations and analyzed for elemental compositions, water-soluble ions, and total carbon during February 2002-January 2003. Fifteen chemical elements, four water-soluble ions, and total carbon were analyzed to assist major source identification by a receptor model approach, known as chemical mass balance. PM10 and PM2.5 were significantly different (p<0.05) at all sites and 24 h averages were high at traffic location while two separated residential sites were similar. Seasonal difference of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations was distinct between dry and wet seasons. Major source of PM10 at the traffic site indicated that automobile emissions and biomass burning-related sources contributed approximately 33% each. Automobiles contributed approximately 39 and 22% of PM10 mass at two residential sites while biomass burning contributed about 36 and 28%. PM10 from re-suspended soil and cooking sources accounted for 10 to 15% at a residential site. Major sources of PM2.5 at traffic site were automobile and biomass burning, contributing approximately 32 and 26%, respectively. Biomass burning was the major source Of PM2.5 mass concentrations at residential sites. Meat cooking also accounted for 31% of PM2.5 mass at a low impact site. Automobile, biomass burning, and road dust were less significant, contributed 10, 6, and 5%, respectively. Major sources identification at some location had difficulty to achieve performance criteria due to limited source profiles. Improved in characterize other sources profiles will help local authority to better air quality. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 677
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, IO31 USEPA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, IO32 USEPA
[3]   Performance evaluation of the portable MiniVOL particulate matter sampler [J].
Baldauf, RW ;
Lane, DD ;
Marotz, GA ;
Wiener, RW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (35) :6087-6091
[4]  
*BANGK METR ADM, 2004, YEARL STAT
[5]   An assessment of source contributions to ambient aerosols in Central Taiwan [J].
Chen, WC ;
Wang, CS ;
Wei, CC .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1997, 47 (04) :501-509
[6]  
HERNANDEZ G, 2002, P 7 INT HIGHW URB PO
[7]   Aerosol optical depth during episodes of Asian dust storms and biomass burning at Kwangju, South Korea [J].
Ogunjobi, KO ;
He, Z ;
Kim, KW ;
Kim, YJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (09) :1313-1323
[8]  
*OTC, 2004, TRAFF STAT BANGK
[9]  
Pollution Control Department (PCD), 2004, THAIL STAT ENV DEC 1
[10]  
QUEROL X, 2002, P 7 INT HIGHW URB PO