Survival Predictability Between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:21
作者
Chen, Li-Ju [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Yun-Jau [3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yao-Jen [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei City Hosp, Heping Branch, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei City Hosp, Zhong Xing Branch, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Taipei Tzu Chi Hosp, Dept Surg, New Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Buddhist Tzu Chi Univ, Sch Med, Hualien, Taiwan
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification; TNM staging system; Overall survival; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/onco.13535
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study compared the prognostic significance of staging between the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study population comprised patients with liver cancer registered in the Taiwan Cancer Database from 2007 to 2013 and was followed up until December 31, 2016. The study included patients with HCC, with known staging in both TNM and BCLC systems, and with follow-up >1 month. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were constructed to investigate the significance of staging by two systems. Goodness-of-fit of model was evaluated via Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the lower the better. Among 73,136 patients with newly diagnosed liver cancer, a total of 37,062 patients with HCC (25.6% underwent surgery) were eligible. The mean age and overall survival of this cohort were 63.9 years and 27.2%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages I, II, III, and IV (the TNM system) were 54.5%, 34.9%, 10.3%, and 6.4%, respectively. Overall survivals for stages A, B, C, and D (the BCLC classification) were 54.5%, 29.2%, 9.8%, and 4.0%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 59.4 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both systems predicted overall survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free rate well. Values of Delta AIC of the BCLC classification and the TNM system were lower for the surgery group and nonsurgery group, respectively. The TNM system (8th edition) predicted long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification in patients with HCC. But in patients treated initially with surgery, the BCLC classification outperformed the 8th edition of the TNM system. Implications for Practice This work demonstrates that the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) system (8th edition) and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification both predict long-term outcome significantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but that the TNM system (8th edition) predicts long-term outcome better than the BCLC classification. For patients treated initially with surgery, BCLC classification outperforms in 8th edition TNM system in predicting long-term outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:E445 / E453
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Critical evaluation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) analysis
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Frankel, Timothy L.
    Sonnenday, Christopher
    Cho, Clifford S.
    Nathan, Hari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 117 (04) : 644 - 650
  • [12] Transcatheter chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison of five staging systems
    Kawaoka, Tomokazu
    Aikata, Hiroshi
    Takaki, Shintaro
    Hashimoto, Yoshimasa
    Katamura, Yoshio
    Hiramatsu, Akira
    Waki, Koji
    Takahashi, Shoichi
    Kamada, Koji
    Kitamoto, Mikiya
    Nakanishi, Toshio
    Ishikawa, Masaki
    Hieda, Masashi
    Kakizawa, Hideaki
    Tanaka, Junko
    Chayama, Kazuaki
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 40 (11) : 1082 - 1091
  • [13] The 7th/8th American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Modified Union for International Cancer Control Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kim, In-Gyu
    Hu, Xu-Guang
    Wang, Hee-Jung
    Kim, Bong-Wan
    Hong, Sung Yeon
    Shen, Xue-Yin
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [14] Prognosis Evaluation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Hepatectomy: Comparison of BCLC, TNM and Hangzhou Criteria Staging Systems
    Liu, Chang
    Duan, Li-gen
    Lu, Wu-sheng
    Yan, Lu-nan
    Xiao, Guang-qin
    Jiang, Li
    Yang, Jian
    Yang, Jia-yin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [15] Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of eleven staging systems
    Liu, Po-Hong
    Hsu, Chia-Yang
    Hsia, Cheng-Yuan
    Lee, Yun-Hsuan
    Su, Chien-Wei
    Huang, Yi-Hsiang
    Lee, Fa-Yauh
    Lin, Han-Chieh
    Huo, Teh-Ia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 (03) : 601 - 608
  • [16] Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma:: Rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials
    Llovet, JM
    Bustamante, J
    Castells, A
    Vilana, R
    Ayuso, MD
    Sala, M
    Brú, C
    Rodés, J
    Bruix, J
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 29 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [17] Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma:: The BCLC staging classification
    Llovet, JM
    Brú, C
    Bruix, J
    [J]. SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 1999, 19 (03) : 329 - 338
  • [18] Hepatocellular carcinoma
    Llovet, JM
    Burroughs, A
    Bruix, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9399) : 1907 - 1917
  • [19] Staging systems of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of literature
    Maida, Marcello
    Orlando, Emanuele
    Camma, Calogero
    Cabibbo, Giuseppe
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (15) : 4141 - 4150
  • [20] Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort
    Marrero, JA
    Fontana, RJ
    Barrat, A
    Askari, F
    Conjeevaram, HS
    Su, GL
    Lok, AS
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 41 (04) : 707 - 716