Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: Neurosonography versus fetal magnetic resonance imaging

被引:12
|
作者
Tanacan, Atakan [1 ]
Ozgen, Burce [2 ]
Fadiloglu, Erdem [1 ]
Unal, Canan [1 ]
Oguz, Kader Karli [2 ]
Beksac, Mehmet Sinan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Perinatol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Fetal magnetic resonance imaging; Fetal neurosonography; Central nervous system abnormalities; Prenatal diagnosis; MRI; ULTRASOUND; ANOMALIES; FETUSES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To share our experience in diagnosis of congenital central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities by fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study design: This study consisted of 110 pregnancies. Neurosonography (NS) findings were compared with MRI results. Anomalies were categorized into 10 groups: 1) Corpus callosum (CC) and cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) anomalies, 2) Neural tube defects (NTD), 3) Posterior fossa anomalies (PFA), 4) Primary ventriculomegaly (PVM), 5) Microcephaly, 6) Macrocephaly, 7) Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), 8) Craniosynostosis, 9) Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and 10) Lumbosacral teratoma. Demographic features, clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes of the study subjects were evaluated. Results: Gestational weeks for NS and for MRI were 25.5 and 26.5 weeks, respectively. Fourteen (12.7%) pregnancies were terminated. PVM (n = 36, 32.7%), CC and CSP anomalies (n = 29, 26.3%), PFA (n = 11, 10%) and NTD (n = 11, 10%) were the most common fetal MRI indications. There were no statistically significant differences between the accuracy of fetal NS and fetal MRI for CC and CSP anomalies, NTDs, PFA and PVM (p = 0.09, 0.43, 0.45 and 0.23, respectively). However, fetal MRI was more accurate for the detection of normal anatomic findings in cases with suspected microcephaly, macrocephaly and craniosynostosis in NS when pooled together (p = 0.007). Furthermore, MRI also seemed to be advantageous in CC & CSP anomalies though it was not validated by statistical measures. No statistically significant difference was found for diagnostic performance of NS and MRI according to gestational week (p = 0.27). Conclusion: Fetal MRI in addition to NS may improve diagnostic accuracy in pregnancies with congenital CNS abnormalities. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: comparison of prenatal neurosonography and foetal magnetic resonance imaging findings
    Demir, Sureyya Saridas
    Cagliyan, Erkan
    Sarioglu, Fatma Ceren
    Guleryuz, Handan
    Altunyurt, Sabahattin
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03) : 389 - 395
  • [2] The characteristics of fetal central nervous system abnormalities in prenatal magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography and their relationship with chromosomal disorders
    Zhou, Qiong
    Liang, Jianye
    Wang, Nengwei
    Zha, Qingbing
    Yan, Ruiling
    Li, Ruiman
    Luo, Liangping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (04): : 4076 - 4087
  • [3] Usefulness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities
    We, Ji Sun
    Young, Lee
    Park, In Yang
    Shin, Jong Chul
    Im, Soo Ah
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (06) : 1443 - 1452
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Fetal Central Nervous System, Head, Neck, and Chest
    O'Connor, Stephen C.
    Rooks, Veronica J.
    Smith, Alice Boyd
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2012, 33 (01) : 86 - 101
  • [5] Second trimester fetal magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnosis of non-central nervous system anomalies
    Amini, Hashem
    Wikstrom, Johan
    Ahlstrom, Hakan
    Axelsson, Ove
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 90 (04) : 380 - 389
  • [6] Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature
    Rossi, A. C.
    Prefumo, F.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04) : 388 - 393
  • [7] Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal diagnosis: A retrospective study
    Ramm, Elisa
    Perdriolle-Galet, Estelle
    Bach-Segura, Pascale
    Bassnagel, Philippe
    Morel, Olivier
    Dap, Matthieu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 307 : 1 - 6
  • [8] Abnormalities of the Fetal Central Nervous System: Prenatal US Diagnosis with Postnatal Correlation
    Cater, Sarah W.
    Boyd, Brita K.
    Ghate, Sujata, V
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2020, 40 (05) : 1458 - 1472
  • [9] MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities
    Levine, D
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2002, 50 (03) : 432 - 448
  • [10] FETAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DEMONSTRATION OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM ABNORMALITIES AND POLYDACTYLY ASSOCIATED WITH JOUBERT SYNDROME
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Su, Yi-Ning
    Huang, Jon-Kway
    Liu, Yu-Peng
    Tsai, Fuu-Jen
    Yang, Chun-Kuang
    Huang, Jian-Pei
    Chen, Chen-Yu
    Wu, Pei-Chen
    Wang', Wayseen
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 49 (02): : 243 - 246