Cost Consideration in the Clinical Guidance Documents of Physician Specialty Societies in the United States

被引:41
作者
Schwartz, Jennifer A. T. [1 ]
Pearson, Steven D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Ctr Clin, Dept Bioeth, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Clin & Econ Review, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
AMERICAN-COLLEGE; HEART-ASSOCIATION; TASK-FORCE; MEDICINE; GUIDELINE; ALLOCATION; CARDIOLOGY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.817
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance: Despite increasing concerns regarding the cost of health care, the consideration of costs in the development of clinical guidance documents by physician specialty societies has received little analysis. Objective: To evaluate the approach to consideration of cost in publicly available clinical guidance documents and methodological statements produced between 2008 and 2012 by the 30 largest US physician specialty societies. Design: Qualitative document review. Main Outcomes and Measures: Whether costs are considered in clinical guidance development, mechanism of cost consideration, and the way that cost issues were used in support of specific clinical practice recommendations. Results: Methodological statements for clinical guidance documents indicated that 17 of 30 physician societies (57%) explicitly integrated costs, 4 (13%) implicitly considered costs, 3 (10%) intentionally excluded costs, and 6 (20%) made no mention. Of the 17 societies that explicitly integrated costs, 9 (53%) consistently used a formal system in which the strength of recommendation was influenced in part by costs, whereas 8 (47%) were inconsistent in their approach or failed to mention the exact mechanism for considering costs. Among the 138 specific recommendations in these guidance documents that included cost as part of the rationale, the most common form of recommendation (50 [36%]) encouraged the use of a specific medical service because of equal effectiveness and lower cost. Conclusions and Relevance: Slightly more than half of the largest US physician societies explicitly consider costs in developing their clinical guidance documents; among these, approximately half use an explicit mechanism for integrating costs into the strength of recommendations. Many societies remain vague in their approach. Physician specialty societies should demonstrate greater transparency and rigor in their approach to cost consideration in documents meant to influence care decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1097
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] Choosing Wisely Helping Physicians and Patients Make Smart Decisions About Their Care
    Cassel, Christine K.
    Guest, James A.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (17): : 1801 - 1802
  • [12] Ebell MH, 2004, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V69, P548
  • [13] RATIONING RESOURCES WHILE IMPROVING QUALITY - HOW TO GET MORE FOR LESS
    EDDY, DM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (10): : 817 - 824
  • [14] The perfect storm of overutilization
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Fuchs, Victor R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (23): : 2789 - 2791
  • [15] The Role Of Costs In Comparative Effectiveness Research
    Garber, Alan M.
    Sox, Harold C.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (10) : 1805 - 1811
  • [16] GRADE working group, 2011, GRADE GUID BEST PRAC
  • [17] 2010 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
    Greenland, Philip
    Alpert, Joseph S.
    Beller, George A.
    Benjamin, Emelia J.
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    Fayad, Zahi A.
    Foster, Elyse
    Hlatky, Mark. A.
    Hodgson, John Mc B.
    Kushner, Frederick G.
    Lauer, Michael S.
    Shaw, Leslee J.
    Smith, Sidney C., Jr.
    Taylor, Allen J.
    Weintraub, William S.
    Wenger, Nanette K.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Anderson, Jeffrey L.
    Albert, Nancy
    Buller, Christopher E.
    Creager, Mark A.
    Ettinger, Steven M.
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Halperin, Jonathan L.
    Hochman, Judith S.
    Kushner, Frederick G.
    Nishimura, Rick
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Page, Richard L.
    Stevenson, William G.
    Tarkington, Lynn G.
    Yancy, Clyde W.
    Lewin, John C.
    May, Charlene
    Bradfield, Lisa
    Keller, Sue
    Barrett, Erin A.
    Denton, Beth
    Brown, Nancy
    Whitman, Gayle R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (25) : E50 - E103
  • [18] Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels -: Suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force
    Guyatt, G
    Baumann, M
    Pauker, S
    Halperin, J
    Maurer, J
    Owens, DK
    Tosteson, ANA
    Carlin, B
    Gutterman, D
    Prins, M
    Lewis, SZ
    Schünemann, H
    [J]. CHEST, 2006, 129 (01) : 182 - 187
  • [19] ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians
    Hendel, Robert C.
    Berman, Daniel S.
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    Heidenreich, Paul A.
    Henkin, Robert E.
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    Pohost, Gerald M.
    Williams, Kim A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (23) : 2201 - 2229
  • [20] 'Marginal Medicine': Targeting Comparative Effectiveness Research To Reduce Waste
    Hoffman, Ari
    Pearson, Steven D.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (04) : W710 - W718