共 56 条
Shear bond strength of glass ionomer and resin-based cements to different types of zirconia
被引:21
作者:
De Angelis, Francesco
[1
]
D'Arcangelo, Camillo
[1
]
Buonvivere, Matteo
[1
]
Rondoni, Giuseppe Daniele
[2
]
Vadini, Mirco
[1
]
机构:
[1] G DAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Unit Restorat Dent & Endodont, Dept Med Oral & Biotechnol Sci, Via Vestini 31, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[2] Private Dent Lab, Savona, Italy
关键词:
MDP;
3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal;
5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia polycrystal;
glass ionomer;
resin-modified glass ionomer;
self-adhesive resin cement;
shear bond strength;
LITHIUM DISILICATE;
SURFACE TREATMENTS;
FLEXURAL STRENGTH;
LUTING CEMENTS;
GENERATIONS;
INTERNAL FIT;
Y-TZP;
CERAMICS;
TOUGHNESS;
SELECTION;
D O I:
10.1111/jerd.12638
中图分类号:
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号:
1003 ;
摘要:
Objective To investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a glass ionomer (GI) cement, an 10-methacryloyloxy-decyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-based adhesive resin cement (MDP-based AC), an MDP-based self-adhesive resin cement (MDP-based SAC), an MDP-free self-adhesive resin cement (MDP-free SAC), and a resin-modified GI (RMGI) cement to a 3 mol% yttria-stabilized (3Y-TZP) and a 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ). Materials and methods Fifty blocks were produced using 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ, assigned to subgroups based on the five cements investigated (n= 10) and luted to cylindrical specimens of the same substrate. Each specimen was loaded in a SBS apparatus to failure. Mean SBS (MPa) values and standard deviations were calculated. Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests (alpha= .05). Failed specimens were subjected to fractographic analysis. Results MDP-based AC and MDP-based SAC cements displayed the highest SBS values with both the substrates; GI cement showed the lowest. RMGI and MDP-free SAC cements performed better with 3Y-TZP than with 5Y-PSZ. Fractographic analysis revealed only adhesive and mixed failures. Conclusions MDP-based AC and MDP-based SAC cements are suitable for both 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ. MDP-free SAC and RMGI cements are adequate choices for 3Y-TZP, but seem less effective with 5Y-PSZ. Clinical significance MDP-based SACs appear to be as reliable as MDP-based ACs for both 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ cementation. Specifically, for 5Y-PSZ cementation, resin-based MDP-free SACs do not seem to guarantee predictable results in terms of SBS.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 814
页数:9
相关论文