Sensitivity and specificity of S2BI for identifying alcohol and cannabis use disorders among adolescents presenting for primary care

被引:19
作者
Levy, Sharon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weitzman, Elissa R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Marin, Alexandra C. [3 ,4 ]
Magane, Kara M. [4 ,7 ]
Wisk, Lauren E. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Shrier, Lydia A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Childrens Hosp, Adolescent Subst Use & Addict Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Dev Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Adolescent Young Adult Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Boston Childrens Hosp, Computat Hlth Informat Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[7] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Substance screening; adolescent; alcohol; cannabis; SUBSTANCE USE; INSTRUMENT; TOBACCO; SCREEN; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1080/08897077.2020.1803180
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) tool was designed to identify substance use disorders in adolescents. We report the S2BI's sensitivity and specificity for identifying alcohol and cannabis use disorders (AUD and CUD) in adolescents presenting for primary care.Methods:Participants aged 14-18 (N = 517) completed an electronic survey, consisting of the S2BI, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and anxiety and depression screens. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of the S2BI compared to the CIDI criterion standard, using past year "monthly" and "weekly or more" consumption of alcohol or marijuana as a threshold for AUD or CUD.Results:Current AUD and CUD were present in 2.9% and 8.3% of the sample, respectively and severe AUD and CUD were present in 0.8% and 3.9%. The S2BI had 53.3% sensitivity and 94.2% specificity for identifying any AUD (PPV = 21.6%; NPV = 98.5%), and 81.4% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity for identifying any CUD (PPV = 47.9%; NPV = 98.2%). The same threshold had 100% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity for identifying moderate/severe AUD, and 90.0% sensitivity and 89.0% specificity for identifying moderate/severe CUD.Conclusions:S2BI had excellent sensitivity and specificity for identifying moderate and severe AUD and CUD. Sensitivity decreased when mild AUD and CUD were included.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 395
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, Pediatrics, V138
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, NSDUH Series H-46, P13
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, ALC SCREEN BRIEF INT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, TECHN ASS PUBL TAP S
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, PRINC AD SUBST US DI
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, PEDIAT S5, V128, pS213
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, AD SUBST US SCREEN T
  • [9] Arroll B, 2010, ANN FARM MED, V8, P4
  • [10] Barry Kristen L, 2004, Subst Abus, V25, P27, DOI 10.1300/J465v25n01_05